The Sudden Approximation: Examining Perturbations on Atomic Electron Motion

  • Thread starter Thread starter bon
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Approximation
bon
Messages
547
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



In the beta decay of tritium (1 proton, 2 neutron) to helium, the emitted electron has a kinetic energy of 19keV. We will consider the effects on the motion of the the atomic electron (the one orbiting the nucles) which we assume is initially in the ground state of tritium.

(a) show that the perturbation is sudden by considering the location of the emmitted electron at a time around T = 5x10^-7 s after emission. How does T compare with the time scale on which the wavefunciton changes.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Well I've worked out the electron would have traveled 3.75 x 10^-9 m. And i know the time scale the wavefn changes is hbar/E but which E do i use? the one for the atomic electron or the other electron? What is this meant to show?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
anyone?
 
You're trying to see whether the perturbation on the atomic electron, by the emitted electron, is sudden. To do this, the question gives a time T by which the emitted electron would be very far from the nucleus. You're trying to compare T with the timescale on which the atomic electron's wavefunction changes, so it only makes sense to use the atomic electron's E.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top