The term mutual velocity, can be described as?

  • Thread starter Thread starter JohnnyB212
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Term Velocity
AI Thread Summary
The term "mutual velocity" refers to the shared velocity of two objects after a collision, particularly in perfectly inelastic collisions where they stick together. In the given scenario, a 110 kg tackler and a 95 kg halfback collide head-on, and their final mutual velocity can be determined using the conservation of momentum. The correct approach involves calculating the total momentum before the collision and setting it equal to the total momentum after the collision, as the two players will move together post-impact. The initial calculations provided were incorrect, and the final mutual velocity should reflect the combined mass and direction of both players. Understanding the concept of mutual velocity is crucial for accurately solving collision problems in physics.
JohnnyB212
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
The term "mutual" velocity, can be described as?

Homework Statement



A 110 kg tackler moving at 3.0 m/s meets head-on (and tackles) a 95 kg halfback moving at 7.5 m/s. What will be their mutual velocity in meters/second immediately after the collision?

Homework Equations



m1 = 110kg
V01 = 3.0 m/s
m2 = 95 kg
V02 = 7.5 m/s
V1f = Final Velocity of the 110 kg tackler
V2f = Final Velocity of halfback

V1f = ((m1-m2)/(m1+m2))V01

V2f = ((2m1)/(m1+m2))V01

The Attempt at a Solution



V1f = 1.68
V2f = 24.68Am I correct for both? How would I determine the mutual velocity? I noticed V02 wasnt used, so I'm a little confused, any help would be appreciated, thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


"Mutual" in the sense of "shared in common". The two players stick together after the collision and thus have the same velocity.

Redo your calculations with that in mind.
 


Doc Al said:
"Mutual" in the sense of "shared in common". The two players stick together after the collision and thus have the same velocity.

Redo your calculations with that in mind.

Was the equation correct?
 


Oh! I caught myself on the V1f, which is actually .5897

Still, confused about the mutual portion. How are you to determine the common similarities of two completely different numbers?
 


JohnnyB212 said:
Was the equation correct?
No.

JohnnyB212 said:
Oh! I caught myself on the V1f, which is actually .5897

Still, confused about the mutual portion. How are you to determine the common similarities of two completely different numbers?
Instead of plugging into some formula (which doesn't apply to this situation), why not just apply conservation of momentum?

The collision is perfectly inelastic (they collide and move together). Hint: Direction matters--they are headed toward each other.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top