The Velocity of Block B Relative to A

  • Thread starter Thread starter kiwifruit
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Block B accelerates to the right at 3 m/s² after force P is applied, reaching a velocity of 2 m/s. The discussion focuses on determining the velocity and acceleration of block B relative to block A, as well as the absolute velocity of point C. The initial equation for total length L is given as L = 3(Sb - Sa) + (Sd - Sa), leading to a differentiation that results in 0 = 3 d(Sb - Sa)/dt + d(Sd - Sa)/dt. There is confusion regarding whether a different equation should be used, specifically L = 3(Sb - Sd) + 4(Sd - Sa), which would yield a different relationship between velocities Va and Vb. The conversation emphasizes simplifying the approach by considering Sd as constant and expressing Sa in terms of Sb.
kiwifruit
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
After applying force P, block B accelerates to the right at 3m/s^2
When B has velocity of 2m/s determine:
1.The velocity of B relative to A
2.The acceleration of B relative to A
3.The absolute velocity of point C

The image attached show how this works.
I worked out the total length,L to get

L = 3(Sb - Sa) + (Sd - Sa)
so if you differentiate with respect to t you get

0 = 3 d(Sb - Sa)/dt + d(Sd - Sa)/dt

then I am stuck.

or is the differential equation supposed to be
L = 3(Sb - Sd) + 4(Sd - Sa)
so differentiating would get
0 = 3 d(Sb - Sd)/dt + 4 d(Sd - Sa)/dt

because somehow Va=3/4Vb
if its the second differential equation could someone explain how to get from there to get Va and Vb?
 

Attachments

  • Picture1.png
    Picture1.png
    4.6 KB · Views: 387
Physics news on Phys.org
hi kiwifruit! :smile:

(try using the X2 icon just above the Reply box :wink:)
kiwifruit said:
L = 3(Sb - Sa) + (Sd - Sa)
so if you differentiate with respect to t you get

0 = …

you're making this very complicated :redface:

Sd is constant, so use the equation for L to find Sa as a function of Sb :smile:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top