The whole racing with light thingy.

  • Thread starter Thread starter misogynisticfeminist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Light Racing
misogynisticfeminist
Messages
370
Reaction score
0
Einstein imagined what would it be like if one would race with light. For the racer, it seems that the light sped away from him at c. But at an intertial frame of reference, the guy seemed to be catching up with the light beam. But, is it possible for the stationary observer to see the racer surpassing the light beam?

Also, would there be any pronouced relativistic effects if one could travel say, a 100 m/s in a BEC, where light travels at around 10 m/s. Or are relativistic effects only felt at velocities close to c, regardless of the medium?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
c

Well, there is NO way to reach c, or exeed it. A stationary observer would see you traveling at c, and the light traveling at c. But one should not use c as a speed in hypothetical calculations, it just doesn't sound right. There is NO way, from any from of reference to reach c, much less exeed it. But, don't conform your mind to these statements, "Imagination is greater that knowledge".

There are 3 types of knowledge in the world, knowledge, understanding, imnagination.
 
misogynisticfeminist said:
Also, would there be any pronouced relativistic effects if one could travel say, a 100 m/s in a BEC, where light travels at around 10 m/s. Or are relativistic effects only felt at velocities close to c, regardless of the medium?

Relativistic calculations are based on c, regardless of the apparent speed of light in the local medium.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...

Similar threads

Back
Top