Theorem about p-groups, similar to 3rd Sylow Theorem

  • Thread starter Thread starter glacier302
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theorem
glacier302
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
(a) Let G be a finite group that is divisible by by p^k, and suppose that H is a subgroup of G with order p^j, where j is less than or equal to k. Show that the number of subgroups of G of order p^k that contain H is congruent to 1 modulo p.

(b) Find an example of a finite group that has exactly p+1 Sylow p-subgroups.

I think that I should be using the 3rd Sylow Theorem (the number of Sylow p-subgroups of G is congruent to 1 modulo p) to prove (a). Also maybe the fact that since H is a p-group, it is contained in Sylow p-subgroup by the 2nd Sylow Theorem, and any larger p-group containing H is also contained in a Sylow p-subgroup.

Any help would be much appreciated : )
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The fact that p-groups have normal subgroups of all orders might prove useful, too.
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
Back
Top