Theoretical situation - surface area vs. friction

AI Thread Summary
When pushing a wooden crate across a floor, the force required remains unchanged regardless of the surface area in contact with the floor. This is because friction is primarily dependent on the mass of the crate and the coefficient of friction, not the surface area. When the crate is turned on end, the reduction in contact area is offset by an increase in normal stress, keeping the overall frictional force constant. Thus, the force applied to maintain constant speed does not need to increase. Understanding this relationship clarifies why surface area does not directly affect the force needed to move the crate.
LadyMario
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
You are pushing a wooden crate across the floor at a constant speed. You decide to turn the crate on end, reducing by half the surface area in contact with the floor. In new orientation, to push the same crate across the same floor with the same speed, the force that you apply must be about: A) four times as great B) twice as great C) equally great D) half as great E) one fourth as great

I'm pretty sure surface area does not relate to the force needed; as friction equations don't account for surface area just mass. But otherwise, I'm really not sure, and there must be more reason to it than that the simple Newton's laws equations not accounting for surface area...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you think in terms of area you could describe the frictional force as the coefficient of friction times the normal force per unit area (pressure) times the area. But when you halve the area, you also double the normal force per unit area. So the frictional force is unchanged. That's why you don't need to consider the area. Does that help??
 
LadyMario said:
You are pushing a wooden crate across the floor at a constant speed. You decide to turn the crate on end, reducing by half the surface area in contact with the floor. In new orientation, to push the same crate across the same floor with the same speed, the force that you apply must be about: A) four times as great B) twice as great C) equally great D) half as great E) one fourth as great

I'm pretty sure surface area does not relate to the force needed; as friction equations don't account for surface area just mass. But otherwise, I'm really not sure, and there must be more reason to it than that the simple Newton's laws equations not accounting for surface area...

On a more fundamental level, in terms of stress, the shear stress at the interface is equal to normal stress times the coefficient of friction. For the case in which the crate is turned on end, what happens to the contact area? What happens to the normal stress? What happens to the shear stress? What happens to the shear force?
 
Dick said:
If you think in terms of area you could describe the frictional force as the coefficient of friction times the normal force per unit area (pressure) times the area. But when you halve the area, you also double the normal force per unit area. So the frictional force is unchanged. That's why you don't need to consider the area. Does that help??

Very much so! Thank you. I knew the answer; just couldn't explain why
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top