Theories about the beginning of the universe

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the inquiry about theories regarding the universe's origin beyond the Big Bang. Garth provides a summary of the Big Bang theory, highlighting key evidence such as the Hubble Redshift, Cosmic Microwave Background radiation, and the elemental composition of the universe. He notes that General Relativity predicts an initial singularity but suggests that quantum effects could allow for alternative scenarios, such as a 'bounce' from a prior universe. Garth acknowledges the existence of various theories but emphasizes the complexity and limitations in observing other universes. The conversation underscores the ongoing exploration of cosmological origins.
amitmis
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
hello,

i'm amit from israel, and i'd love to be an activated member in your forum.

my first question - are there other theories about the beginning of the univers. except of "the big bang" (not religion)?

thanks,
amit
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
amitmis said:
hello,

i'm amit from israel, and i'd love to be an activated member in your forum.

my first question - are there other theories about the beginning of the univers. except of "the big bang" (not religion)?

thanks,
amit
Hello amit from Israel, I'm Garth from England, welcome to these Forums!

You will get the opportunity to ask many questions here because that is how we learn!

There is strong evidence that the universe went through a period of intense compression and temperature from which it has expanded, the Big Bang.

The three main pieces of evidence are:
1. The Hubble Red shift, interpreted as a Doppler shift of the other galaxies and quasars, which are receding from us as the consequence of that expansion.
2. The Cosmic Microwave Background which is an all-surrounding bath of radiation at a temperature of 2.70K. This if you like is the 'echo' of the BB, received not as a sound but as a 'flash' of radiation now much red shifted into the microwave region of the electromagnetic spectrum.
3. When all the nucleosynthesis that has gone on inside stars has been taken into account it seems that the original mix before our galaxy and its stars existed was about 3/4 hydrogen and 1/4 helium (by mass). How can this be explained? When the BB is considered as a vast nuclear explosion and the nuclear reactions worked out it transpires that what should come out of the BB should be 3/4 hydrogen and 1/4 helium (by mass)! This agreement is very difficult to explain otherwise.


The accepted and tested theory of gravity, General Relativity, allows one to predict back from the present into the very first moments of the BB and GR on its own does not allow an alternative to an initial singularity (zero volume, infinite mass density and temperature). However at some stage GR must break down as the entire universe is then compressed into a region over which quantum effects would predominate. It is possible that such effects might (when predicting backwards in time) enable the BB singularity to be avoided. There might have been a 'bounce' from an earlier universe. The BB certainly is a beginning of our universe but of conjecture about other universes there is no end, unfortunately we can't see any of them!

So there are different theories about the beginning of the universe. Of course it also all depends on what units of mass, length and time you use, and how you make measurements at the other end of the universe. But such approaches are probably a bit advanced for now!

Garth
 
Last edited:
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top