Theory of Ammeters: Does it Affect Current Measurement?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the accuracy of moving coil ammeters in measuring current. It highlights that the coil in the ammeter responds only to a small portion of the total current, raising concerns about potential inaccuracies. The deflection of the needle is proportional to this small current, which can lead to misleading readings if not properly calibrated. Measurement error is acknowledged as a common issue, varying based on the precision of the instrument used. Ultimately, the ammeter's readings are not inherently wrong but are limited by their design and precision capabilities.
cupid.callin
Messages
1,130
Reaction score
1
<Pic> This is the theory of ammeter give in a book.
please read it.

Now, my question is that coil will only respond to the current through it i.e. i1.
But this is a very small part of total current (Rc >> r).
Does this mean that all the moving coil ammeters show wrong current?

Please help me.
 

Attachments

  • 00994.jpg
    00994.jpg
    30.4 KB · Views: 449
Physics news on Phys.org
The deflection of the needle is proportional to the current i1 through it, which is proportional to the total current i. So if i1 is 1A and moves the needle 1mm, and i1 is 1/1000th of i, the scale on the piece of paper behind the needle will show 1000A for each 1mm increment of the needle.

There will always on any measurement device be an estimate of error depending on how precise the instrument is. It could be 0.001% or 1% or 10%. 'Wrong current' is only a matter of precision in most cases. If your ammeter can tell you current to 3 decimal places (mA) and you need it accurate to 12 decimal places (pA) then you just need to get a better ammeter, your ammeter isn't necessarily wrong, merely operating within its limits of its estimate of error.
 
Ok! well that seems to be a satisfying answer!

Thank you for your help Zryn!
really appreciate it~~!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top