Theory undergrad -> experiment graduate

AI Thread Summary
Switching from theoretical to experimental research is common among undergraduates entering graduate school. Many undergrads primarily engage in theoretical or computational research, as real experimental work is rare at this level. Graduate programs focus less on specific coursework and more on a candidate's demonstrated interest and ability in their chosen field. While some skills may be gained from computational work, the lack of hands-on experimental experience is not a significant barrier, as graduate schools prioritize a student's enthusiasm and potential over their undergraduate research background. Misconceptions about the importance of specific skills or experiences in applications are common, but the key is to convey genuine interest in the subject matter.
PrismAndGate
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
This may have been better to ask before I finished my grad school applications, but I think it will still be useful..
As an undergrad all my research experience has been theoretical/computational related to applied physics,materials, energy..., but in my applications I indicated reasons for wanting to do experimental research in similar areas to the computational experience I had. I didn't extend my math background much beyond the required PDEs, linear algebra, etc, and stuff, too.

I know we aren't supposed to know exactly what we want to do t this point, but is this type of "switch" common for undergrads entering grad school?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I am not quite sure what you are referring to here.
Undergrads never (or at least very rarely) do any "real" experiments (lab exercises do not really count in this context), so there is no such things as an "experimental" undergrad.
 
PrismAndGate said:
As an undergrad all my research experience has been theoretical/computational

The research experience you've gained is very minimal compared to what you'll actually do at graduate level so the actual material you cover isn't all that important. It's more about getting interested in the subject and if you can pick up some bonus skills along the way, like programming in computational work then great.

Experimental work is pretty much all computational nowadays, but even then, graduate schools will never consider an undergraduate student as committed to theory or experimental work based on the courses they've done. The most important thing to them is that you can demonstrate ability and the fact that you're actually interested in their subject.
 
f95toli said:
I am not quite sure what you are referring to here.
Undergrads never (or at least very rarely) do any "real" experiments (lab exercises do not really count in this context), so there is no such things as an "experimental" undergrad.

Haha...yeah I know that. I'm sure there are plenty of students who do both types of projects. I guess my question was focused towards the types of skills one might be missing out on by not doing a research project in an experimental group.

Experimental work is pretty much all computational nowadays, but even then, graduate schools will never consider an undergraduate student as committed to theory or experimental work based on the courses they've done. The most important thing to them is that you can demonstrate ability and the fact that you're actually interested in their subject.
Thanks, your reply is the kind of thing I was looking for to get my perspective towards the right track. I think I picked up some misconceptions on other websites.
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...

Similar threads

Replies
16
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
941
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
36
Views
4K
Back
Top