Archived Thermal Collisions: Billiard-Ball Example | Problem 6.40

  • Thread starter Thread starter Doom of Doom
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Collisions Thermal
AI Thread Summary
In thermal physics, the concept of thermal equilibrium raises the question of why gas molecules do not all share the same speed despite collisions. A billiard-ball example illustrates that during non-head-on collisions, a faster ball can gain energy while a slower ball loses energy, demonstrating that energy and momentum can be conserved without equalizing speeds. Specifically, if a fast-moving ball collides perpendicularly with a slower one, it can maintain its initial velocity while gaining velocity in a new direction, thus increasing its overall speed. This redistribution of velocity in different directions is key to understanding molecular behavior in gases. The discussion highlights that non-head-on collisions are essential for explaining variations in molecular speeds in thermal equilibrium.
Doom of Doom
Messages
85
Reaction score
0
This is a homework question from my thermal physics class. (Problem 6.40 from Schroeder's Introduction to Thermal Physics).

Homework Statement


"You might wonder why all the molecules in a gas in thermal equilibrium don;t have exactly the same speed. After all, when two molecules collide, doesn't the faster one always lose energy and the slower one always gain energy? And if so, wouldn't repeated collisions eventually bring all the molecules to some common speed? Describe an example of a billiard-ball collision in which this is not the case: the faster ball gains energy and the slower ball loses energy. Include numbers, and be sure that your collisions conserve energy and momentum."

Homework Equations


Because the particles are all the same mass, the conservation of energy and momentum become:

v_1^2 + v_2^2 = v_1'^2 + v_2'^2
v_1 + v_2 = v_1' + v_2'

The Attempt at a Solution



I was thinking that it would be possible if two molecules were moving perpendicular to each other. If the fast one was moving along, then it was hit in the side by another (slower moving) molecule, the fast molecule would keep its velocity in the direction it was initially traveling, and gain velocity in the perpendicular direction, thus increasing its overall velocity. Is this the only case?m
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes. Any collision that is not head on will lead to a "redistribution" of the velocity among the different Cartesian directions, which can lead to an increase or a decreas in speed.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top