Thermal Conduction and Newton's Law of Cooling

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the compatibility of Fourier's law of thermal conduction and Newton's law of cooling, particularly in scenarios involving temperature discontinuities. Participants explore theoretical implications and practical examples related to thermal conduction and cooling processes.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Fourier's law of thermal conduction is stated as \mathbf{j}=-k\nabla T, leading to the conclusion that a temperature discontinuity could cause \frac{dQ}{dt} to diverge, raising questions about compatibility with Newton's law of cooling.
  • Some participants question the assumption of a temperature discontinuity at the surface, suggesting that the equation applies within the region bounded by the surface rather than at the surface itself.
  • A practical example is introduced involving a warm bottle of beer placed in a refrigerator, illustrating an initial temperature discontinuity between the beer and the surrounding air.
  • It is noted that while Newton's law of cooling can handle the situation, Fourier's law predicts an infinite rate of cooling at the surface initially.
  • One participant argues that the infinite rate of cooling is only temporary and that the cumulative heat transfer over short times is proportional to time to the 1/2 power, which can be derived from solving the transient heat conduction equation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of temperature discontinuities and the compatibility of the two laws. There is no consensus on whether Fourier's law and Newton's law are mutually incompatible, as various perspectives and interpretations are presented.

Contextual Notes

Participants discuss the limitations of applying Fourier's law at surfaces with temperature discontinuities and the assumptions involved in their reasoning. The discussion highlights the complexities of transient heat conduction and the conditions under which each law is applicable.

dEdt
Messages
286
Reaction score
2
Fourier's law of thermal conduction states that \mathbf{j}=-k\nabla T, where \mathbf{j} is the heat flux. Integrating both sides of this equation over a closed surface gives the equation \frac{dQ}{dt}=-k\int \nabla T \cdot d\mathbf A.

If there is a temperature discontinuity across this surface, then \frac{dQ}{dt} diverges, in contradiction with Newton's law of cooling. Are Fourier's law of conduction and Newton's law of cooling mutually incompatible?
 
Science news on Phys.org
dEdt said:
Fourier's law of thermal conduction states that \mathbf{j}=-k\nabla T, where \mathbf{j} is the heat flux. Integrating both sides of this equation over a closed surface gives the equation \frac{dQ}{dt}=-k\int \nabla T \cdot d\mathbf A.

If there is a temperature discontinuity across this surface, then \frac{dQ}{dt} diverges, in contradiction with Newton's law of cooling. Are Fourier's law of conduction and Newton's law of cooling mutually incompatible?
What makes you think there can be a temperature discontinuity at the surface? There, of course, can be a discontinuity of the temperature gradient at the surface, but this equation applies inside the region bounded by the surface.

Chet
 
Chestermiller said:
What makes you think there can be a temperature discontinuity at the surface? There, of course, can be a discontinuity of the temperature gradient at the surface, but this equation applies inside the region bounded by the surface.

Chet

Well, let's imagine that you put a warm bottle of beer in a refrigerator to cool it down. At the surface of the bottle there is (at least initially) a temperature discontinuity, because the beer and the air in the fridge are at different temperatures. Newton's law of cooling has no trouble handling this, but Fourier predicts (at least initially) an infinite rate of cooling.
 
dEdt said:
Newton's law of cooling has no trouble handling this, but Fourier predicts (at least initially) an infinite rate of cooling.

It predicts an infinite rate of cooling of the infinitesimally thin layer of the can that is in contact with the cold air, which is probably approximately right.
 
dEdt said:
Well, let's imagine that you put a warm bottle of beer in a refrigerator to cool it down. At the surface of the bottle there is (at least initially) a temperature discontinuity, because the beer and the air in the fridge are at different temperatures. Newton's law of cooling has no trouble handling this, but Fourier predicts (at least initially) an infinite rate of cooling.
Yes, this is true, but it only lasts an instant. And the cumulative amount of heat transferred at short times will be proportional to time to the 1/2 power. One can determine this by solving the transient heat conduction equation in the region near the boundary using a similarity solution (i.e. Boundary layer solution).

Chet
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
814
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K