Thermal conductivity and heat capacity

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the thermal conductivity of a gas using kinetic theory, represented by the equation κ=nCmoleculeλ<v>/3. It emphasizes the relationship between the number density of gas molecules, their heat capacity, mean free path, and mean speed. The conversation highlights the importance of using the heat capacity at constant volume (CV) in the derivation, as the calculations assume a steady state where both temperature and volume are fixed. Participants clarify that starting at constant volume is essential to maintain consistency throughout the calculation. The conclusion reinforces the need to adhere to the original constraints of constant volume and pressure in the analysis.
physiks
Messages
101
Reaction score
0
Using kinetic theory, we can derive an expression for the thermal conductivity of a gas to be
κ=nCmoleculeλ<v>/3
where n is the number density of the molecules in the gas, Cmolecule is the heat capacity of a single molcule (i.e the heat that must be given to each molecule to raise the temperature of the gas by unit temperature), λ is the mean free path and <v> is the mean speed of the molecules.

Now we can write nCmolecule=CV/V where CV is the heat capacity of the gas at constant volume and V is the total volume of the gas. Now I understand that nCmolecule=C/V where C is the heat capacity of the gas, and obviously because we have a gas we must have either C=CV or C=Cp because the gas must be held at either constant volume or constant pressure. However, I am not sure sure how to see why we have to consider the heat capacity at constant volume here - why can't it be constant pressure...

Thankyou for any answers in advance
 
Science news on Phys.org
physiks said:
why we have to consider the heat capacity at constant volume here
physiks said:
n is the number density
Stick with the original constraints on the calculation.
 
Bystander said:
Stick with the original constraints on the calculation.

What does this mean?
 
You started your calculation at constant V. Finish at constant V.
 
Bystander said:
You started your calculation at constant V. Finish at constant V.

Ok, but I can't see why we started at constant V?
 
You haven't included any dependence of V on P, T.
 
Bystander said:
You haven't included any dependence of V on P, T.

Oh I see, so my derivation basically assumes the whole system is in a steady state (transport properties are for steady state systems), because I used a fixed temperature gradient. So then the pressure and volume must be fixed (if the pressure was fixed but volume varied, my temperature would change, so we need to fix volume and pressure).
 
Back
Top