Thermal resistances adding formula

  • Thread starter Thread starter LinearMan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formula Thermal
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving the formulas for adding thermal resistances in series and parallel configurations. For resistances in series, the total thermal resistance is the sum of individual resistances (R = R1 + R2). In parallel, the total resistance is calculated using the formula 1/R = 1/R1 + 1/R2. The conversation draws parallels between thermal resistance and electrical resistance, noting that heat flow corresponds to thermal resistance similar to how current relates to electrical resistance. The analogy helps clarify the concepts despite the differences in the underlying physics.
LinearMan
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Prove a rule for adding of Thermal resistances
for: A)R1 and R2 in Series
B)R1 and R2 in Parallel

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


According to the book the result should be :
A) R = R1 + R2
B) 1/R = 1/R1 + 1/R2

So i thought we can get some ideas from the theory of Electrical resistance because these formulas are similar for example here: http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/k-12/airplane/ohmrser.html .
However, I don't know how to start (in Thermodynamics there is no Electric current etc., so we can hardly use Ohm´s formula like in previous case).
Thanks for help
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The thermodynamic analog of current is the Heat Current defined as the rate of flow of heat through the material and the analog of voltage is temperature difference
 
OK, thank you.
 
I get it
 
in Thermodynamics there is no Electric current etc., so we can hardly use Ohm´s formula like in previous case

Not exactly but...

heat flow = ΔT/Thermal Resistance

which is similar to

Current = ΔV/Electrical Resistance

I'll let you work out the units.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top