Thermo physics. Dealing with adding dQ to a system with P held constant.

oexnorth
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
"Measured heat capacities of solids and liquids are almost always at constant pressure, not constant volume. To see why, estimate the pressure needed to keep V fixed as T increases, as follows.
a)First imagine slightly increasing the temp of a material at constant pressure. Write the change in volume, dV1, in terms of dT and the thermal expansion coefficient Beta."
There's more to it, but I'll start with just this for now.



Beta=deltaV/(VdeltaT), PV=NkT,



It says to write in terms of dT and Beta, but I am having a hard time trying to get rid of V when I rearrange as dV1=Beta*V*dT. I am missing something here, I just need a push in the right direction.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Anybody?
 
Your equation is correct; the question should have included V.
 
Thank you. But if it tells me to write v1 in terms of dt and Beta, then doesn't that mean I have to get rid of the V term?

Here's some more equations, I don't know if it will help.

Specific heat is C
Q is heat added or lost to the system
deltaU is the change in internal energy of the system
partialX is the partial derivative of a variable.
W is the work done on the system
Cp is C under conditions of constant pressure
C=Q/deltaT=(deltaU-deltaW)/deltaT
Cp=partialU/partialT+P(partialV/partialT)

Thanks again.
 
You've got to have the system size somewhere in the equation, as dT and \beta are both intensive properties.

Another option is to call dV the normalized change in volume, so it's just a number.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top