Thermodyn.: ideal gases in 2 two chambers separated by a sliding barrier

sunrah
Messages
191
Reaction score
22

Homework Statement


Two different ideal gases are separated by a sliding barrier that can move vertically. The gas in the upper chamber 1 has n moles of material, whilst the gas in the lower chamber 2 has 3n moles of material. At T0 the weight of the barrier is such that the volumes of the two chambers are equal. What is the ratio of V2/V1at T1.

Homework Equations



P = F/A
W = mg
PV = nRT

The Attempt at a Solution



Equilibrium at T0: F2 = F1 + W
where the Fi are the forces from the i gas on the barrier.

therefore W = F2 - F1 = A(P2 - P1)
\frac{3AnRT_{0}}{V_{2}} - \frac{AnRT_{0}}{V_{1}} = \frac{2AnRT_{0}}{V_{0}}, because V_{0} = V_{1}(T_{0}) = V_{2}(T_{0})
further W = \frac{4AnRT_{0}}{V}, because V_{0} = \frac{V}{2} where V is the total volume of the two chambers!

Now I want to check equilibrium forces at T1 but using F2 = F1 + W for T1 and substituting for constant weight will not allow me to calculate the ratio V2/V1!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi, sunrah.

Can you use the fact that Vtotal = V1 + V2 to eliminate V2, say, from your equation F2=F1+W at T1? Then maybe you can solve for V1 in terms of T1, T0, and Vtotal. Once you have V1 you should be able to get an expression for V2 and then construct the ratio of the final volumes.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top