Thermodynamically irreversible processes

AI Thread Summary
Thermodynamically reversible processes can be reversed at any moment with an infinitesimal change in conditions, while irreversible processes cannot return to their original state without additional work. All spontaneous processes are inherently irreversible, meaning they require more energy to revert to their initial conditions. The significance of understanding these concepts lies in their application in engineering, where reversible processes serve as benchmarks for maximum efficiency. By analyzing reversible processes first, engineers can identify the ideal performance before addressing real-world irreversibilities. Understanding these principles is crucial for grasping the second law of thermodynamics.
loom91
Messages
404
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I was wondering something. Exactly what is meant by a thermodynamically reversible/irreversible process? What are their relation to spontaneous processes? These concepts seem to be fundamental to the understanding of the second law, but textbooks (including the industry standard Atkins Physical Chemistry) seem to gloss them over or give a very superfluous explanation. Thanks a lot!

Molu
 
Physics news on Phys.org
loom91 said:
Hi,

I was wondering something. Exactly what is meant by a thermodynamically reversible/irreversible process? What are their relation to spontaneous processes? These concepts seem to be fundamental to the understanding of the second law, but textbooks (including the industry standard Atkins Physical Chemistry) seem to gloss them over or give a very superfluous explanation. Thanks a lot!

Molu

A reversible process is one which, at any point of time, can be reversed to attain the exact state as in the beginning. Obviously, for this to happen, we would need infinite intermediate steps, and thus infinite time.
In practice, no process is exactly reversible.
Rather, all spontaneous processes are irreversible in nature.
 
loom91 said:
Hi,

I was wondering something. Exactly what is meant by a thermodynamically reversible/irreversible process? What are their relation to spontaneous processes? These concepts seem to be fundamental to the understanding of the second law, but textbooks (including the industry standard Atkins Physical Chemistry) seem to gloss them over or give a very superfluous explanation.
A reversible process is a process whose direction can be reversed by an infinitessimal change in conditions.

For example, a reversible expansion of a gas would be one that by an infinitiessimal increase in external pressure results in compression.

A reversible flow of heat would occur with an infinitessimal temperature difference. By increasing the temperature of the colder reservoir an infinitessimal amount, the flow of heat can be reversed.

AM
 
Andrew Mason said:
A reversible process is a process whose direction can be reversed by an infinitessimal change in conditions.

For example, a reversible expansion of a gas would be one that by an infinitiessimal increase in external pressure results in compression.

A reversible flow of heat would occur with an infinitessimal temperature difference. By increasing the temperature of the colder reservoir an infinitessimal amount, the flow of heat can be reversed.

AM

All right, I get that. But this seems a very formal definition. What is its significance? Why do we care whether a process is reversible?

Thanks.

Molu
 
We know that every real process is irreversible in that they would require the input of more work to get the process back to its initial starting point.

The reversible process is usually easier to use to examine a system. That will usually give you a benchmark of what the absolute "best" performance/output you can ever get. In engineering, the first step is usually to look at the reversible process and see if the 100% efficient process would meet your requirements. If it does, then you start to look at the irreversibilities and make things more complicated.
 
FredGarvin said:
We know that every real process is irreversible in that they would require the input of more work to get the process back to its initial starting point.


why is that Fred?
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top