Thermodynamics and polytropic ideal gas (very simple theory question)

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of thermodynamic principles, specifically focusing on the work done by a polytropic ideal gas in a quasi-static process. Participants explore the mathematical formulation of work in relation to pressure and volume, particularly when the polytropic index n equals 1.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the integration process in the work equation, specifically how constants can be factored out when substituting pressure in terms of volume.
  • Another participant suggests that the initial conditions (p1 and V1) are constants that can be used in the integration, clarifying that the relationship pV = c allows for this substitution.
  • A different participant points out that the original equation in the book is missing a subscript for pressure, emphasizing the need for clarity in the notation.
  • Concerns are raised about the validity of the integral equality when considering that V1 and V may not be the same, questioning the assumptions made in the derivation.
  • One participant expresses satisfaction after resolving their confusion, indicating that the discussion helped clarify their understanding.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants exhibit a mix of agreement and disagreement regarding the treatment of constants in the integration process and the assumptions underlying the polytropic process. The discussion does not reach a consensus on the clarity of the original equation or the implications of the integral equality.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved questions regarding the assumptions made about the relationship between pressure and volume during the integration process, particularly in the context of changing conditions in a quasi-static process.

member 428835
hey all!

i have a question i was hoping some of you could unravel. specifically, in thermodynamics i understand in a quasi-static situation we can right work as:

[tex]W=\int PdV[/tex] where [itex]W[/itex] is work, [itex]P[/itex] is pressure, and [itex]V[/itex] is volume.

my book defines polytropic to be [tex]PV^n = constant[/tex]

it then writes the following polytropic, quasi-static equality when [itex]n=1[/itex] , which is where i am lost:

[tex]W=\int PdV = \int P \frac{{V_1}}{V} dV = P{V_1} \int \frac{{dV}}{V} = P{V_1} ln(\frac{{V_2}}{V_1})[/tex]

specifically, if [itex]PV_1[/itex] is constant, then if we pull it out of the integral how is it we integrate over [itex]\frac{1}{V}[/itex] ? why doesn't the equality implode here: [tex]\int P \frac{{V_1}}{V} dV = P{V_1} \int \frac{{dV}}{V}[/tex] if [itex]V_1[/itex] is a constant why isn't [itex]V[/itex]? any help is greatly appreciated!
 
Science news on Phys.org
I think either you copied something wrong our your book is leaving out a small detail here. Namely, for the polytropic process with [itex]n=1[/itex], you have the relation simplified to
[tex]pV = c.[/tex]
So, if you have some base state that represents the starting conditions of your system, you can say
[tex]p_1 V_1 = c.[/tex]
There, [itex]p_1[/itex] and [itex]V_1[/itex] are both constants because they simply represent the pressure and volume of your system at its initial state. You can rearrange this for substitution into the work equation,
[tex]p = \dfrac{c}{V} = \dfrac{p_1 V_1}{V}[/tex]
They are initial conditions. Going back to your work equation,
[tex]W = \int\limits_1^2 p\;dV = \int\limits_1^2 \dfrac{p_1 V_1}{V}\;dV = p_1 V_1 \int\limits_1^2 \dfrac{1}{V}\;dV = p_1 V_1 \left.\ln(V)\right|_1^2 = p_1 V_1 \left[\ln(V_2) - \ln(V_1)\right] = p_1 V_1 \ln\left(\dfrac{V_2}{V_1}\right)[/tex]
which recovers the answer in your question with the exception that there is a subscript 1 in front of the pressure term. The key is that you know that [itex]pV[/itex] is equal to a constant, and you "know" the initial state of the system, so you can replace that constant with the values of [itex]p[/itex] and [itex]V[/itex] at that initial state, and both of those are constants and can be removed from the integral. In short, [itex]p_1[/itex] and [/itex]V_1[/itex] are constants while [itex]p[/itex] and [itex]V[/itex] are not because the former refer to specific values of the later at a specific time, and those don't change.
 
joshmccraney said:
hey all!

i have a question i was hoping some of you could unravel. specifically, in thermodynamics i understand in a quasi-static situation we can right work as:

[tex]W=\int PdV[/tex] where [itex]W[/itex] is work, [itex]P[/itex] is pressure, and [itex]V[/itex] is volume.

my book defines polytropic to be [tex]PV^n = constant[/tex]

it then writes the following polytropic, quasi-static equality when [itex]n=1[/itex] , which is where i am lost:

[tex]W=\int PdV = \int P \frac{{V_1}}{V} dV = P{V_1} \int \frac{{dV}}{V} = P{V_1} ln(\frac{{V_2}}{V_1})[/tex]
The P is missing a subscript.

If PV = constant then PV must equal P1V1, so P = P1V1/V.

So:

[tex]W=\int PdV = \int P_1 \frac{{V_1}}{V} dV = P_1V_1 \int \frac{{dV}}{V} = P_1V_1 ln(\frac{{V_2}}{V_1})[/tex]

specifically, if [itex]PV_1[/itex] is constant,

PV = constant. So PV1 cannot be constant (ie. P cannot be constant) as V changes.

AM
 
boneh3ad said:
In short, [itex]p_1[/itex] and [itex]V_1[/itex] are constants while [itex]p[/itex] and [itex]V[/itex] are not because the former refer to specific values of the later at a specific time, and those don't change.

if this is true, how can we make the questionable integral equality? it seems if [itex]V_1 \neq V[/itex] then we cannot have the equality that was pointed out. can you explain?
 
never mind, it just "clicked". thanks guys! yay for PF saving the day again!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K