Thermodynamics - engine efficiency

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the efficiency of a reversible engine operating with an ideal monatomic gas through a defined thermodynamic cycle. The cycle includes isothermal and isovolumic processes, and participants are tasked with determining the engine's efficiency based on work done and heat absorbed.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculation of efficiency using different ratios of work and heat energy, questioning the validity of their values and the appropriate equations to use.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on using the correct heat values for calculating efficiency, while others are exploring different interpretations of the efficiency equation. There is a recognition of discrepancies in calculations and a search for clarity on the correct approach.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating through the complexities of thermodynamic cycles and the definitions of heat and work in the context of engine efficiency. There are mentions of specific values and calculations that may not align, indicating potential misunderstandings or misapplications of the concepts involved.

portofino
Messages
35
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A reversible engine contains 0.20 mol of ideal monatomic gas, initially at 600 K and confined to 2.0 L. The gas undergoes the following cycle:

Isothermal expansion to 4.0 L.
Isovolumic cooling to 300 K.
Isothermal compression to 2.0 L.
Isovolumic heating to 600 K.

Determine the engine's efficiency, defined as the ratio of the work done to only the heat absorbed during the cycle.

Homework Equations



efficiency, e = W/Q_h = (Q_h - Q_c)/Q_h = 1 - (Q_c/Q_h) where W is work, Q_h is heat energy (high), and Q_c is cool heat energy (low)

The Attempt at a Solution



in the problem leading to the question, i was asked to determine net work and net heat added during the cycle, there values are as follows:

net heat added during cycle: Q = 350 Joules

net work done during cycle: W = 350 Joules

now when i try and determine the efficiency i did this:

e = W/Q_h = (Q_h - Q_c)/Q_h = 1 - (Q_c/Q_h)

e = 350/600 = (600 - 300)/600 = 1 - (300/600), i used the 350/600 = 57.6% because the problem asked for the ratio of work and heat energy

i realized that 350/600 is not equivalent to the other ratios. since (600 - 300)/600 = 50% = 1 - (300/600) =/= 57.6%

which ratio am i supposed to use, the W/Q_h = 350/600 = 57.6% is incorrect? are my values correct for each variable?

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
\frac{Q_h - Q_c}{Q_h} is the maximum efficiency possible. The engine cycle you are using is not a Carnot cycle, so its efficiency will be lower than the maximum possible efficiency.
 
the question wants me to use a ratio of work and heat energy though, why should i use (Q_h - Q_c)/Q_h? so should i be getting 50% then is use the efficiency equation you suggest?
 
using (Q_h - Q_c)/Q_h = (600 - 300)/600 = 50% was not correct? what am i doing wrong?
 
the equation for efficiency is e=W/Qh
where W is the net work you found, and Qh is the sum of the heat added (only add the positive Q values you found for the process - which should be two values)
*just wondering do you go to umbc?
 
nah i go to old dominion, i already tried W/Q_h where W = 350 joules, my original Q_h was wrong i used temp not Q, as for Net = 691.5-748.3+748.3-345.8 = 345.8, so should e = 350/345.8 = 101.2 % or 350/350 = 100%? or should it be Q_h = 691.5 + 748.3 = 1439.8 so e = 350/1439.8 = 24.3%?
 
right, you just use the positive Q values, so that last part is right, i got 24.3% and it showed up as right on MP.
hmm, its weird tho, because i saw some of your other posts, and u have a lot of the exact same homework problems as i do - including engineering, lol.
 
oh i should've been more specific, i do know people who go to umbc, i am actually posting on behalf of one my old school mates who goes to umbc, he works nights and can't get stuff done

btw 24.3 worked
 
whoah, scryplr, i go to umbc too! had one look at the blackboard discussion board and realized how crap it was, i came here cos this place works

you should post there and get more people to join here, everyone could collab so much better

do you know how do to 19.54?
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
12K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K