Thermodynamics: Free Energy Confusion

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the concepts of enthalpy, Gibbs free energy, and Helmholtz free energy in thermodynamics, with a focus on understanding their definitions and relationships. Enthalpy is defined as the total energy required to create a system, incorporating internal energy and compression work, while Gibbs free energy accounts for heat contributions from the environment at constant pressure and temperature. The participant expresses confusion about the inequality ΔQ ≤ TΔS and the absence of compression work in Helmholtz free energy, questioning the implications of these terms. The conversation invites corrections and clarifications to enhance understanding of these thermodynamic principles. Overall, the thread aims to clarify foundational concepts in thermodynamics for better comprehension.
WWCY
Messages
476
Reaction score
14

Homework Statement


Hi all, I'm having quite a big problem trying to understand the concept of enthalpy and free energy. I feel that a good way to sort this out is to write out what I understand about these things and have people correct me. Thanks in advance for any assistance.

I'm learning thermodynamics from Schroeder's text.

Enthalpy, ##H = U + PV##

At constant pressure, Enthalpy is the total energy required to create a system with internal energy ##U##out of nothing. This total energy is the sum of the system's internal energy and the compression work needed to create space for the system.

Enthalpy change, ##\Delta H = \Delta U + \Delta PV = \Delta Q + \Delta W_{other}## where ##\Delta U = \Delta Q + \Delta W_{other}##

At constant pressure, ##\Delta H## is the amount of work needed to increase the internal energy of a system while doing more compression work to create even more space for it.
It also says that I can only retrieve energy in the form of heat and non-compression work by drawing from a system's enthalpy.

Gibbs' Free Energy ##G = U - TS + PV##

At constant pressure and temperature, ##G## is the total energy required to create a system with internal energy ##U## out of nothing. This total energy is the sum of the system's internal energy and the compression work needed to create space for the system. However, it also takes into account the amount of heat ##TS_{final}##we can draw from the environment while building the system.

Gibbs' Free Energy Change##\Delta G = \Delta U - T\Delta S + P\Delta V = \Delta W_{other} + \Delta Q - T\Delta S ##

At constant pressure and temperature, ##\Delta G## represents the amount of energy needed to increase a system's internal energy while doing compression work on its surroundings. However, we can offset the environment's contribution of heat by deducting ##T\Delta S##. It also shows that we can draw ##\Delta W_{other}## at most (quasistatic change), by decreasing a system's ##G## since ##\Delta Q \leqslant T\Delta S ##.

Question: Why is ##\Delta Q \leqslant T\Delta S ## the case?

Helmholtz Free Energy ##F = U - TS##

At constant temperature, this represents the amount of energy needed to create a system with internal energy ##U##, while offsetting environmental heat contributions ##TS_{final}##.

Question: Why does this not include compression work ##PV##? While I understand that pressure is not taken to be constant, do we not need to do work to create space for the system?

Helmholtz Free Energy Change ##\Delta F = \Delta U - T \Delta S = \Delta Q + \Delta W_{all} - T\Delta S##

This tells us the amount of work needed to increase a system's internal energy while taking into account environmental contributions of heat ##T\Delta S##. It also tells us that should we draw from a system's ##F##, we can obtain energy in the form of ##\Delta W_{all}## at most (quasistatic changes). ##\Delta Q \leqslant T\Delta S ##

Question: Again, not too sure why ##\Delta Q \leqslant T\Delta S ## and why no compression-work term is included.

Please feel free to add on points that are important and of course, correct any misconceptions.

Thanks very much in advance!

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Would anyone be so kind as to assist? Thank you!
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top