Thermodynamics: Heat Sink Experiment - 3 Pots vs. 2 Pots

  • Thread starter Thread starter dsisk559
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Thermodynamics
AI Thread Summary
In the discussion, two scenarios involving pots of water and heat transfer are presented. Scenario 1 has two pots at 100 degrees Celsius and 0 degrees Celsius, reaching 50 degrees Celsius in 10 minutes. Scenario 2 introduces a third pot, also at 0 degrees, and questions whether it will take the same, more, or less time to reach 66 degrees Celsius. Theoretical considerations suggest that reaching exact temperatures takes infinite time, but practical approximations can be used. It is concluded that equilibrium will be reached faster in Scenario 1 due to fewer variables affecting heat transfer.
dsisk559
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
First off this is not a homework question that i know of. I'm not in school but I had an idea I want to flesh out but I don't have the training to come up with the answer on my own.
Scenario 1:

There are 2 pots of water the 1st at 100 degrees c and a 2nd at 0 degrees.
There is a heat sink going from the middle of the first to the middle of the second.
It takes 10 minutes to for both pots to reach 50 degrees c.

Scenario 2:
There are 3 pots of water the 1st and 2nd at 100 degrees c and the 3rd at 0 degrees.
There is a heat sink connecting all pots just like above.

The question is will it take the same, more or less time to reach 66 degrees c in all 3 pots as it did in Scenario 1.
 
Science news on Phys.org
There's a small problem: theoretically, it should take an infinite amount of time for the pots to get to 50 and 66.6 degrees, since the rate of heat transfer decreases as the temperature difference decreases. The final temperature is approached asymptotically but is never reached. However, we can get around this problem by specifying that the temperatures get arbitrarily close to their final temperature (50.1 and 66.7 degrees, for example)

Now we can get on with solving the real question. It may be easiest to solve it numerically; that is, divide the total time into small intervals and for each interval calculate the amount of heat energy that flows through the connection and also calculate how the temperature of the pots is affected by the energy change. Then repeat for the next interval and so on until the temperature has converged satisfactorily. Does this make sense?
 
Sadly it does not make since to me because I have no training in thermodynamics and not much training in math. I'm sorry but can you just tell me weather it will take longer, the same or less time to reach near equilibrium.

Thank you for your help.
 
The process is fastest when the pots are the same size (i.e., equilibrium will be reached faster in scenario 1).
 
Thread 'Thermo Hydrodynamic Effect'
Vídeo: The footage was filmed in real time. The rotor takes advantage of the thermal agitation of the water. The agitation is uniform, so the resultant is zero. When the aluminum cylinders containing frozen water are immersed in the water, about 30% of their surface is in contact with the water, and the rest is thermally insulated by styrofoam. This creates an imbalance in the agitation: the cold side of the water "shrinks," so that the hot side pushes the cylinders toward the cold...
Back
Top