Thermodynamics without partition function

AI Thread Summary
Entropy and free energy can be derived without using the partition function, as thermodynamics predates statistical mechanics. The Helmholtz free energy is defined as F = U - TS, and entropy can be obtained from heat capacity using the relation C_V = T (∂S/∂T)_V. The discussion highlights the complexity of deriving entropy from heat capacity alone. The original poster eventually found a solution to their query and indicated the thread could be closed. Sharing the discovered method could benefit others interested in the topic.
cryptist
Messages
121
Reaction score
1
Is there a way to derive entropy or free energy without using partition function?
 
Science news on Phys.org
Yes.

If you want a more complete answer, you'll have to post a more detailed question.
 
Thermodynamics came before statistical mechanics.
 
As you all know, N=∑ni, U=∑εi, F=Nμ-kT∑Z and S=(U-F)/T

Here, I do not want to use partition function Z. How do I write F and S then?
 
Last edited:
The Helmoholtz free energy is defined as
$$
F \equiv U - TS
$$
Entropy you can get from the heat capacity:
$$
C_V \equiv T \left( \frac{\partial S}{\partial T} \right)_V
$$
 
Let me specify the problem. I am using grand canonical ensemble and I am in Fermi-Dirac statistics.

Considering these, entropy is written as S=k[lnZ+β(E-μN)]. How do I write S, without using Z?
 
Last edited:
DrClaude said:
The Helmoholtz free energy is defined as
$$
F \equiv U - TS
$$
Entropy you can get from the heat capacity:
$$
C_V \equiv T \left( \frac{\partial S}{\partial T} \right)_V
$$

Heat capacity is a derived quantity. It is really complicated to extract S from Cv.
 
Jorriss said:
Thermodynamics came before statistical mechanics.

Ok. Then, how do I derive S without using partition function (a statistical mechanics tool)? Btw, by deriving S, I mean I'll calculate the entropy of a system over momentum states, I am not talking about S=klnΩ which apparently does not include partition function.
 
Anyway, I found the answer by myself. Thread can be closed.
 
  • #10
cryptist said:
Anyway, I found the answer by myself. Thread can be closed.

It would be nice to share with us the answer you found :smile:
 
Back
Top