Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

I Entropy Contradiction for a Single Harmonic Oscillator

  1. Jun 6, 2018 #1
    Making use of the partition function, it is straight forward to show that the entropy of a single quantum harmonic oscillator is:
    $$\sigma_{1} = \frac{\hbar\omega/\tau}{\exp(\hbar\omega/\tau) - 1} - \log[1 - \exp(-\hbar\omega/\tau)]$$

    However, if we look at the partition function for a single harmonic oscillator, then it is just g(1,n) = 1.
    If we take the the logarithm of g(1,n), then we get the entropy is 0 which is in direct contradiction to our above result for σ1.

    What is going on here?

    This is all the more confusing because you can show that the partition function and multiplicity function approach are consistent for the N oscillator system. Namely, given that the partition function for the N-oscillator system is:
    $$ Z_{N} = Z_{1}^{N}$$
    We can readily get the result:
    $$\sigma_{N} = N\sigma_{1}$$

    We can then check this result by starting with the multiplicity function for N harmonic oscillators:
    $$ g(N,n) = \frac{(N+n-1)!}{n!(N-1)!}$$
    take the logarithm to get the entropy, and then use the definition for temperature
    $$\frac{1}{\tau} = \frac{\partial\sigma}{\partial U}$$

    Cranking through this, we can reproduce our above result for σN. Thus, for the N harmonic oscillator problem, calculating the entropy with a partition function approach is shown to be consistent with a multiplicity function approach even though it is not true for N=1. HOW??
  2. jcsd
  3. Jun 7, 2018 #2
    EDIT: Above I wrote:
    I meant to say that the multiplicity function is g(1,n) = 1. Not the partition function.
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?