Thickness between glass plates

AI Thread Summary
Interference patterns between glass plates depend on the gap thickness and the coherence of the light source. Patterns are visible when the separation is on the order of a few wavelengths of light, typically less than the coherence length of the source. Non-laser light sources have short coherence times, limiting the visibility of interference at larger separations. In contrast, lasers maintain coherence over longer distances, allowing for observable patterns even with greater gaps. Understanding coherence time is crucial for determining the upper limit of thickness at which interference patterns remain visible.
jetpeach
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi, I generally understand interference and Newton's ring/Young's double slit experiments, but I can't find the answer to a pretty simple question:
When two glass plates are placed together and their is a gap of thickness "t", contructive and destructive interference leads to interference patterns as described http://physics.bu.edu/~duffy/PY106/Diffraction.html
but at what thickness will these patterns no longer be visible, at least by eye? Basically, I find tons of things saying, "from the inner and outer surface of a bubble light is reflected and interfers... and patterns show depending on m*lambda... " But at what upper limit of the integer wavelengths of light does this stop? If you have two glass plates 1cm apart, clearly you don't see interference due to the gap between them, but what about 1mm? 100um?

Basically, one of my advisors states that because we can see interference patterns between our glass plates, they are separated by at most a few wavelengths of light, but I'm wondering why or how this is the case and if I can prove it. Thanks for any help! Be back in the morning to follow up,
jet
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The presence of the interference pattern also depends on a radiation source. Because of reflections from different spots, the reflected waves reach an observer with a time delay. So the source should keep its phase during that time interval.
Usual non-laser sources have very short coherence time, so we cannot see any coherence if interfering waves arrives with a delay of several periods. Lasers, on the other hands, can keep their coherence longer, so we can see an interference pattern resulting from reflections from more separated surfaces. Now there will be another problem- to keep the distance constant with a precision better then wavelength.
 
thanks

Ahhh, coherence time (and length) seem to provide be the answer to my question.
just if anyone else is interested
http://www.physlink.com/Education/AskExperts/ae372.cfm
http://www.absoluteastronomy.com/encyclopedia/C/Co/Coherence_length.htm
Thanks much, jetpeach
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top