Thinking about matrices/polynomials

  • Thread starter Thread starter eep
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Thinking
eep
Messages
225
Reaction score
0
Hi,
A homework problem I ran across awhile ago asked me to determine if a set of of 2x2 Matrices were a basis for the set of aa 2x2 matrices.

Am I going to run into any pitfalls by thinking about such 2x2 matrices as vectors of 4 components? Basically what I did was turn each 2x2 matrix into a 4x1 vector. Each row represented an entry in matrix A (row 1 was A11, row 2 was A12, row 3 was A21, row 4 was A22).

Basically, I have no problems in dealing with vectors but when I run across problems where I'm given either polynomials or matrices with columns I'm unsure as to how I can approach them. For polynomials I figure I can just treat each power of x as a separate component of a vector. Any insight would be appreciate and sorry if this post is jibberish, I'm a little tired. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As long as you are dealing with matrices as a vector space you are not using matrix product so, yes, you can just think of 2x2 matrices as a 4 dimensional vector.
 
Am I going to run into any pitfalls by thinking about such 2x2 matrices as vectors of 4 components? Basically what I did was turn each 2x2 matrix into a 4x1 vector. Each row represented an entry in matrix A (row 1 was A11, row 2 was A12, row 3 was A21, row 4 was A22).
It sounds like you're just using the coordinates defined by the ordered basis:

<br /> \left(<br /> \left[\begin{array}{ll}1 &amp; 0 \\ 0 &amp; 0 \end{array}\right]<br /> ,<br /> \left[\begin{array}{ll}0 &amp; 1 \\ 0 &amp; 0 \end{array}\right]<br /> ,<br /> \left[\begin{array}{ll}0 &amp; 0 \\ 1 &amp; 0 \end{array}\right]<br /> ,<br /> \left[\begin{array}{ll}0 &amp; 0 \\ 0 &amp; 1 \end{array}\right]<br /> \right)<br />

and using coordinates is fine, though not always the most efficient method of working with vectors.


(Yes, \left[\begin{array}{ll}1 &amp; 0 \\ 0 &amp; 0 \end{array}\right] is a vector, and so is x^3 - 4x + 17. You sound like you might be confusing yourself by using "vector" as a synonym for "n-tuple")
 
Last edited:
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top