This Fourier Transfer Function properties?.

monchosoad
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi Everyone. I want to know what do you think about this Transfer function:

T(\omega) = \frac{e^{i\omega\tau}}{1-\rho e^{i2\omega\tau}}

If\tau is Real, this function is "good and pretty"(?), because it has a "nice" representation in time with its inverse transform: a delay plus a series of deltas displaced in time in n\tau times \rho^n.
But the question is: What about if \tau is Complex?? Is there a magical property that I'm missing to deal with this?

Sorry if i was mistaken on the election of the Forum. I don't know if this question may be in "Physics" because T(\omega) is the Fabry-Perot Transfer Function, or in Engineering. And sorry for my English.

Thanks!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The simplest case of a FP resonator is that when the medium in between the mirrors is just vacuum, in that case ##\tau## is a constant with respect to frequency. By invoking that ##\tau## be complex (which physically means the intermediate medium is absorbing), this implies that this quantity must also be a function of frequency - there is no occurrence in reality where the index of refraction contained in ##\tau## is a constant complex number as this would violate Kramers-Kronig relation. Furthermore, there is no closed form of the dependence of refractive index on frequency as this is medium specific, so if ##\tau## is complex which also means ##\tau## is frequency dependent, the inverse FT of ##T(\omega)## won't be as nice as it is for free space case and I believe its analytical expression does not exist.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Back
Top