This implies that the circulation around the ellipse ##C## is also zero.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Differentiate1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circulation
Differentiate1
Messages
34
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



F = y2z3i + 2xyz3j +3xy2z2k
Find the circulation of F in the clockwise direction as seen from above, around the ellipse C in which the plane
2x + 3y - z = 0 meets the cylinder x2 + y2 = 16

Homework Equations



∫ F (dot) dr = ∫∫ (∇xF) (dot) k dA

The Attempt at a Solution



z = 2x + 3y ==> z = (8cosθ + 12sinθ)
r(θ) = 4cosθi + 4sinθj + (8cosθ + 12sinθ)k
dr = -4sinθi + 4cosθj + (-8sinθ + 12cosθ)k

I'm thinking of substituting the values from r(θ) to F, but that would appear to be too much work due to the third powers and having to multiply the results together after substituting.

However, the other equation ∫∫ (∇xF) (dot) k dA appears to be easier. I computed the curl of F and got 0, which is my answer at this time. Instead of having to substitute the values of r(θ) to F (which would be a pain), the curl of F shows that the circulation is 0.

I need confirmation whether this is true and the answer, 0 circulation is correct.

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
##\vec F## is indeed conservative since ##\text{curl}(\vec F) = 0##.

The line integral of a conservative vector field around any closed path (within the domain) is zero.
 
Another cool way to see this is to use Stokes' theorem.

$$\oint_C \vec F \cdot d \vec r = \iint_S \text{curl}(\vec F) \cdot d \vec S$$

The intersection of the plane with the cylinder creates a piecewise smooth surface ##S## comprised of a slanted top surface ##S_1##, a cylindrical shell ##S_2##, and a circular bottom region ##S_3## bounded by ##z = 0##. The net flux out of this surface is zero:

$$\oint_C \vec F \cdot d \vec r = \iint_S \text{curl}(\vec F) \cdot d \vec S = \iint_{S_1} \text{curl}(\vec F) \cdot d \vec S_1 + \iint_{S_2} \text{curl}(\vec F) \cdot d \vec S_2 + \iint_{S_3} \text{curl}(\vec F) \cdot d \vec S_3 = 0$$
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top