Thorium fission reactors face significant hurdles, including economic challenges due to existing uranium infrastructure and technological issues related to molten solid coolant, which complicates handling and safety. The thorium fuel cycle requires thorium-232 to capture a neutron and decay into fissile uranium-233, a process that emits dangerous gamma radiation. Additionally, the production of uranium-232 during irradiation raises safety concerns due to its own gamma emissions. While thorium is touted for its lower waste and proliferation risks, it is not necessarily a cheaper alternative to uranium. Overall, the complexities of coolant options and the long decay times of thorium waste products further complicate the transition to thorium-based nuclear power.