Thorium Fission: Overcoming Hurdles to Power

  • Thread starter Thread starter #Thomas#
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Power
AI Thread Summary
Thorium fission reactors face significant hurdles, including economic challenges due to existing uranium infrastructure and technological issues related to molten solid coolant, which complicates handling and safety. The thorium fuel cycle requires thorium-232 to capture a neutron and decay into fissile uranium-233, a process that emits dangerous gamma radiation. Additionally, the production of uranium-232 during irradiation raises safety concerns due to its own gamma emissions. While thorium is touted for its lower waste and proliferation risks, it is not necessarily a cheaper alternative to uranium. Overall, the complexities of coolant options and the long decay times of thorium waste products further complicate the transition to thorium-based nuclear power.
#Thomas#
Messages
35
Reaction score
2
Greetings,

I am curious, what is keeping us from having thorium fission reactors? What are the hurdles that we need to overcome?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Economic. Uranium infrastructure is extant. Technological, molten solid coolant is problematic.
 
What else are we going to do with uranium anyways.
 
There's also the political angle. Just as nuclear power was starting to get popular again, Fukushima Daiichi happened, which is a real shame. If I recall, the thorium cycle produces less waste, is more abundant on the planet, and cannot be weaponized (or not very easily), so it has little to no proliferation concerns.
 
#Thomas# said:
Greetings,

I am curious, what is keeping us from having thorium fission reactors? What are the hurdles that we need to overcome?

One big obstacle is that thorium itself doesn't fission. Thorium-232 captures a neutron and then decays into U-233, which is capable of fission. However, this decay process involves the emission of gamma radiation, which makes handling irradiated Th-232 material very dangerous.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thorium_fuel_cycle

The irradiation of thorium also produces U-232, which is not fissile, but which also produces gamma rays as it decays.

All in all, thorium is not the cheap nuclear fuel which has been portrayed by some.
 
Alright then, 2 more follow up questions:

1) Does it really have to be molten solid coolant? Whats wrong with using thorium with water coolant? And why is liquefied solid coolant such a big problem, I know of at least 1 place where it is in use, the solar tower in spain...

2) How long is the decay of the thorium waste compared to uranium?
 
  • Like
Likes Kelson Adams
Fission byproducts, waste, are a spectrum. A long lived thorium waste product is 232 Pa with a half-life of 32,760 years. But a long half-life makes for a lower specific activity.

Molten coolant is often the solvent for the dissolved fuel.

Coolant other than water will become activated, radioactive, a leak then is a leak of solidifying radioactive material. See the Monju disaster.
 
Last edited:
Ahh, yes, makes sense, to stiffen up is a lot better than to spill around. But what are the problems with implementation? I know that there's a solar tower in spain that uses molten salt to generate power when there is no sunlight, like at night.
 
Back
Top