Thorium Fuel Cycle Reaction Initiation

AI Thread Summary
In a liquid fluoride thorium reactor (LFTR), the reaction is initiated using a small amount of fissile material, typically U-235, which serves as a neutron source to start the fission process. As the reactor operates, U-233 is bred from thorium and is chemically separated from the circulating fuel solution. The reactor achieves criticality as the liquid fuel flows through graphite moderator channels, facilitating the fission reaction. Neutron sources may also be strategically placed within the reactor system to enhance the initiation of the reaction. Overall, the LFTR relies on a combination of initial fissile material and the breeding of U-233 to sustain its operation.
DLHill
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
In an liquid fluoride thorium reactor, how is the reaction started? My assumption would be a piece of fissile material would be somehow inserted into the fuel to introduce neutrons to the solution, but I have not found any information to show if this is how the reaction is started. If this is not it, how do the reactors begin breeding and fissioning the U 233?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
DLHill said:
In an liquid fluoride thorium reactor, how is the reaction started? My assumption would be a piece of fissile material would be somehow inserted into the fuel to introduce neutrons to the solution, but I have not found any information to show if this is how the reaction is started. If this is not it, how do the reactors begin breeding and fissioning the U 233?
An LFTR would start with U-235 with U-233 increasing as it is produced in the system. U-233 would be chemically separated from the recirculating solution. Likely there would be 'neutron sources' placed in the reactor system.

One can look at the operation of the MSR at ORNL.
 
The liquid fuel becomes critical as it flows through graphite moderator channels, sort of like an RBMK.
 
Hello everyone, I am currently working on a burnup calculation for a fuel assembly with repeated geometric structures using MCNP6. I have defined two materials (Material 1 and Material 2) which are actually the same material but located in different positions. However, after running the calculation with the BURN card, I am encountering an issue where all burnup information(power fraction(Initial input is 1,but output file is 0), burnup, mass, etc.) for Material 2 is zero, while Material 1...
Hi everyone, I'm a complete beginner with MCNP and trying to learn how to perform burnup calculations. Right now, I'm feeling a bit lost and not sure where to start. I found the OECD-NEA Burnup Credit Calculational Criticality Benchmark (Phase I-B) and was wondering if anyone has worked through this specific benchmark using MCNP6? If so, would you be willing to share your MCNP input file for it? Seeing an actual working example would be incredibly helpful for my learning. I'd be really...
Back
Top