Thoughts about Keith R Symon's textbook

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bleakfacade
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Textbook Thoughts
AI Thread Summary
An undergraduate student in their final year is seeking recommendations for a more challenging classical mechanics textbook after enjoying John R. Taylor's work. They are considering a book suggested by their professor and are looking for opinions on its suitability. Other participants in the discussion recommend Symon's textbook as being comparable in difficulty to Marion and Thornton, while also suggesting Greenwood as a more concise alternative to Goldstein, which some find verbose. The student has completed most of Marion and Thornton's material and is preparing to tackle Goldstein, with a focus on building a strong foundation in classical mechanics before progressing to solid mechanics and quantum mechanics. The consensus is that the student should be well-prepared to start Goldstein after their current studies, although not all chapters may be necessary for standard coursework.
Bleakfacade
Messages
9
Reaction score
1
Hello there, I am an undergraduate student in my final year. I have been using classical mechanics by John R Taylor, which I should say I have absolutely enjoyed working through so far. I now feel I am prepared for a slightly more challenging set of problems and mathematical rigour. My professor suggested to me this textbook, https://www.amazon.com/dp/0201073927/?tag=pfamazon01-20.
Having never used nor heard of this book(no offence intended to enthusiasts, if any at all :smile:), I would greatle appreciate your thoughts about this book. I thank you all in advance.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Shyan said:

I have worked through M&T in a lot of detail. I am only left with the problems from continuous systems and special relativity. The aim is to work through Goldstein's as soon as possible. I felt I needed an abridgement before I begin Goldstein's. Do you reckon M&T would be enough? Can I start Goldstein's if I have worked through M&T and Taylor's?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Bleakfacade said:
I have worked through M&T in a lot of detail. I am only left with the problems from continuous systems and special relativity. The aim is to work through Goldstein's as soon as possible. I felt I needed an abridgement before I begin Goldstein's. Do you reckon M&T would be enough? Can I start Goldstein's if I have worked through M&T and Taylor's?

I think you'll have no problem if you try hard enough. You won't need to cover all chapters of the Goldstein though because the chapters on canonical transformations, Hamilton-Jacobi theory, Chaos and Perturbation theory are not part of standard courses on classical mechanics.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
alan2 said:
If you've finished Marion and understood it I suggest https://www.amazon.com/dp/0486696901/?tag=pfamazon01-20

Can't go wrong at the price. Some people might like Goldstein but I find it a bit verbose. Greenwood gets to the point.

Thank you Alan, I will go through this book.

@Shyan: The intention is to go into the very heart of classical mechanics. I want to have a well hardened foundation before I start solid mechanics and Quantum mechanics. However, I appreciate your advice.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Symon is a good classical mechanics textbook at roughly the same level as Marion and Thornton. I recommend it. It may be a little harder to find than Marion. I used it to for my qualifying exam in the 1970's. It is not as well known these days but your professor was right to recommend it.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
6K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
34
Views
6K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
16K
Back
Top