Thoughts on gravity and space time

AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the concept of gravity as a phenomenon resulting from objects seeking equilibrium within warped space-time, rather than a force of attraction. It suggests that weightlessness represents a state of equilibrium, and that gravity's effects permeate through all mass, similar to how the center of gravity functions in an aircraft. The idea is presented that gravity is akin to pressure felt by an object in this warped space-time, with free-falling objects moving straight ahead within it. The conversation also touches on how temperature affects mass, indicating that energy has a corresponding mass. Ultimately, while gravity's influence diminishes at the center of a mass, true equilibrium is not achieved, as forces are still at play.
Bucko1001
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
If the Mass of an object is said to warp space time, could it be said that "gravity" is really an object trying to come to equilibrium within the warped space time, i bit like a cork in water. the reason we feel force at the Earth's surface is that the Earth is already at equilibrium which prevents us from reaching the point of equilibrium.

This points to the fact that weightlessness is just the state of equilibrium within space time.

until these thoughts i used to wonder if the effects of "Gravity" would change the deeper you went into the earth. but now the effects of warped space time must permeate through all mass a bit like the C of G of an aircraft, the warping must reach end at the centre of the mass!

as this is my first time is this just stating the obvious or shall i continue
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
sorry it took so long but been away. Not quite sure how to understand your link but that would be my failing. Yes you are right i did miss explain myself i was trying to suggest that Gravity is not a force of attraction between 2 objects which is how most explanations show it. my idea is that Gravity is really a pressure felt by an object which is trying to come into equilibrium within warped space time. a bit like a cork in water however this is almost a 2D explanation.
 
Bucko1001 said:
my idea is that Gravity is really a pressure felt by an object which is trying to come into equilibrium within warped space time.
In GR objects which are in equilibrium (free falling) simply advance straight ahead within warped space time. Just like that yellow ball in the linked animation.
 
This would be correct if this object was an atom, you have to understand anything that has matter/energy has a coresponding mass. . . . I think this is correct because something that is hot weighs slightly more than the same object at a cooler temperature hence energy has in some form mass, and vice versa(E=mc2). . . If you take a sphere, all the atoms in this sphere are bending spacetime individually, however the overall force makes them all fall towards the center. And since when you reach the center of the object like if there was a whole in the center of a sphere, yes eventually the effect of gravity on you becomes less and less till you reach the center where there will be no net force, But you have not reached equilibrium. Its like a game of tug of war, when the two teams are evenly matched and the flag doesn't move, its not at equilibrium because the two teams are still exerting forces on the rope.
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top