Three biggest factors to determine if atoms will bond

AI Thread Summary
A user is developing a simple atom and molecule simulator for a side project, acknowledging limitations in accuracy due to their background in computer science rather than physics. The current model uses the valence rule for bonding and a simplified electrostatic repulsion model to determine molecular shapes, achieving reasonable accuracy for simple hydrocarbons. The user aims to simulate combustion reactions and seeks advice on adding realism without significantly increasing computational demands. Suggestions include considering factors beyond valence, such as molecular geometry and Lewis structures, while noting that more complex chemistry concepts typically require extensive study. The discussion references VSEPR theory as a relevant approach for predicting molecular shapes.
NotASmurf
Messages
150
Reaction score
2
Hey all, I am looking to make a simple atom and molecule simulator for a side project, I know it obviously has no hope of being 100% accurate due to my lack of degree in physics and processing power restrictions.

So far I have made them bond according solely to valence rule (which I know its a simplified model in itself riddled with exceptions, and the molecule shape is currently being determined by finding lowest resistance configuration of the atoms using a simplified model of electrostatic repulsion between the electrons, the program seems to get the shape of some simple hydrocarbons correct,

My final goal is to get it to be able to simulate combustion reactions on a small scale.

this is not my area as I have only a completed high school education of chemistry, my main field is computer science. What other factors could I add to add realism without becoming too computationally expensive? Any advice appreciated.
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Valence can't be all that matters, you don't see uranium hexahydride, anybody got any two other things that count that don't require insane systems of Schrodinger equations?
 
Predicting how the molecules look like and how they react is what you learn studying chemistry. If there were reasonable shortcuts they would be taught during a one semester crash course, not over several years :wink:

What you did so far with geometry sounds a bit like equivalent to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VSEPR_theory - but without lone pairs.

For simple molecules https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lewis_structure is a reasonably good tool for predicting the formula.
 
  • Like
Likes NotASmurf
Thank you for the link to VSEPR :D,
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top