Three Blocks with Forces: Calculating Contact Forces

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the contact forces between three blocks on a frictionless surface when a horizontal force of 24N is applied to the first block (m1=1kg, m2=2kg, m3=3kg). The acceleration of the blocks is determined to be 4m/s², and the net forces on each block are calculated as 4N for m1, 8N for m2, and 12N for m3. The confusion arises regarding the contact forces, particularly how to determine the force exerted by m2 on m1. It is clarified that the contact force between m1 and m2 is 20N, which satisfies Newton's second law, and that this force is independent of the masses of the blocks involved. Understanding the relationship between the blocks and the forces acting on them is crucial for accurate calculations.
chopramon
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Three blocks are in contact with each other on a frictionless horizontal surface with
m1=1kg
m2=2kg
m3=3kg

A horizontal force of 24N is applied to M1.

a) Find the acceleration of the three blocks

b) Find the net force on each block

c) Find the magnitude of the contact forces between the blocks


I have successfully answered questions a) and b) I am confused about c)

a) F = ma
24N = (m1 + m2 + m3)a
a = 4m/s^2

b)Fm1 = 4N
Fm2 = 8N
Fm3 = 12N

c) Thanks for any help with this part
 
Physics news on Phys.org
My main confusion lies with the fact that there are 3 blocks in contact with each other and not just 2.

Given the fact that Block one has a Fnet of 4N and a force being applied of 24N, a total force in the other direction must be 20N. But that would be from (m2 and m3) how would we get the force just from M2 on M1
 
The 20N force you have calculated is the normal contact force between the first and 2nd block, in satisfaction of Newton's 2nd Law. It is not correct to say that this force comes from either or both masses. Like supposing a 100N block sits at rest on a table. The normal contact force of the table on the block, from Newton's 1st law, is 100N upward, regardless of the table's mass.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top