Three-Dimensional Matrix Multiplication

marschmellow
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
Does this concept exist? Google yields weird results that mostly have to do with programming, and Wikipedia says nothing about it. I always find that I understand tensor math better when I can translate it into matrix notation, but if I'm dealing with tensors of too high a rank, I don't know what to do anymore.

And if it does exist, I have some questions about the function of the extra dimension in the arrays. Column vectors correspond to vectors, and row vectors correspond to 1-forms, so what would vectors "orthogonal" (in the physical notation space) to row vectors and column vectors correspond to?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What you are asking is, how to multiply ##\left( \sum u_\rho \otimes v_\rho \otimes w_\rho \right)\left( \sum u'_\tau \otimes v'_\tau \otimes w'_\tau \right)## given as vectors in coordinate form and write the result in this form again.

Now here we are at the crucial point: How should this multiplication be defined? There are various possibilities, depending on whether dual vector spaces are involved, what the purpose of such a multiplication is, whether it is in three dimensional space where we have a cross product, whether it is just the multiplication in the tensor algebra etc.

So the answer to your question is: yes, but details depend on details given.
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
Back
Top