Throwing a ball from atop a hill

  • Thread starter Thread starter swevener
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ball Hill
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around determining the optimal angle for throwing a rock from the peak of a hill sloping at an angle ##\phi## to achieve maximum range. The initial approach involved rotating the reference frame, which led to a confusing result of -75º for the angle ##\theta##, suggesting the rock would be thrown through the hill. Participants suggested solving the problem without rotation, as it complicated the calculations unnecessarily. Ultimately, the issue was identified as stemming from the rotated frame, which offset the answer by 90º. The correct approach confirmed that the optimal angle for a 60º slope should indeed yield a more intuitive result of 15º.
swevener
Messages
21
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A boy stands at the peak of a hill which slopes downward uniformly at angle ##\phi##. At what angle ##\theta## from the horizontal should he throw a rock so that it has the greatest range?

Homework Equations


##\mathbf{s} = \mathbf{v}_0 t + \frac{1}{2} \mathbf{a} t^2##

##\mathbf{v} = \mathbf{v}_0 + \mathbf{a} t##

The Attempt at a Solution


First I tilted the reference frame so the sloping hill is horizontal and the initial velocity is at an angle ##\theta + \phi## from the ground. This makes the acceleration ##\mathbf{a} = g \sin(\phi) \hat{\imath} - g \cos(\phi) \hat{\jmath}##. So position is given by
\mathbf{s} = \left[ v_0 t \cos(\theta + \phi) + \frac12 g t^2 \sin(\phi) \right] \hat{\imath} + \left[ v_0 t \sin(\theta + \phi) - \frac12 g t^2 \cos(\phi) \right] \hat{\jmath}. Taking the derivative with respect to time,
\mathbf{v} = \left[ v_0 \cos(\theta + \phi) + g t \sin(\phi) \right] \hat{\imath} + \left[ v_0 \sin(\theta + \phi) - g t \cos(\phi) \right] \hat{\jmath}.Setting the vertical component of velocity equal to zero gives half the total flight time:
t_{\text{max}} = \frac{v_0 \sin(\theta + \phi)}{g \cos(\theta)}. Plugging ##2 t_{\text{max}}## into the horizontal component of ##\mathbf{s}## gives the distance traveled:
\begin{align}s_x (2 t_{\text{max}}) &amp;= v_0 \frac{2 v_0 \sin(\theta + \phi)}{g \cos(\phi)} \cos(\theta + \phi) + \frac12 g \sin(\phi) \frac{4 v_0^2 \sin^2(\theta + \phi)}{\cos^2(\phi)} \\<br /> &amp;= \frac{2 v_0^2}{g \cos(\phi)} [ \sin(\theta + \phi) \cos(\theta + \phi) + \sin^2(\theta + \phi) \tan(\phi) ].\end{align}
To find the optimal ##\theta## for a given ##\phi##, take
\begin{align}\frac{\text{d}}{\text{d} \theta} s_x (2 t_{\text{max}}) = 0 &amp;= \cos(\theta + \phi) \cos(\theta + \phi) - \sin(\theta + \phi) \sin(\theta + \phi) + 2 \sin(\theta + \phi) \cos(\theta + \phi) \tan(\phi) \\<br /> &amp;= \cos^2(\theta + \phi) - \sin^2(\theta + \phi) + \sin(2(\theta + \phi)) \tan(\phi) \\<br /> &amp;= \cos(2(\theta + \phi)) + \sin(2(\theta + \phi)) \tan(\phi).\end{align} A bit of algebra gives
\tan(2(\theta + \phi)) = - \cot(\phi), which results in an equation for ##\theta##
\theta = \frac12 \arctan(-\cot(\phi)) - \phi.
Now, the book's hint was that when ##\phi## is 60º, ##\theta## should be 15º. My equation spits out -75º, which has the slight problem of meaning the boy would be throwing the rock through the hill. So my question is why am I off by 90º? Did I make a mistake in my math somewhere? Does it have to do with rotating my reference frame? :frown:
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
well -75 degrees seems suspiciously like 15 degrees

so your book says it slopes down at 60 degrees so should you be using -60 degrees?

I would try to solve it without the rotation to see if things work out.
 
Last edited:
It seems to me my equation should be spitting out 15º, not 15º - 90º.
 
jedishrfu said:
so your book says it slopes down at 60 degrees so should you be using -60 degrees?

I would try to solve it without the rotation to see if things work out.

Using -60º just gives me +75º. I've played with all the signs; the only answer that (sort of) works out is the one I got.

And solving the problem without the frame rotation is all kinds of unpleasant.
 
swevener said:
And solving the problem without the frame rotation is all kinds of unpleasant.
Not really.
Flight time t, hor dist x, vert dist y (measuring positive downwards), accn a, initial velocity u at θ above horizontal:
-ut sin(θ) + at2/2 = y = x tan(ϕ) = ut cos(θ)tan(ϕ)
at/2u = tan(ϕ)cos(θ) + sin(θ)
xa/u2 = 2tan(ϕ)cos2(θ) + 2 sin(θ)cos(θ) = tan(ϕ)(cos(2θ)+1) + sin(2θ)
For max x:
tan(ϕ)(-2sin(2θ)) + 2cos(2θ) = 0
tan(ϕ) = cot(2θ)
ϕ = π/2 - 2θ
 
haruspex said:
Not really.

Well, it was the way I was trying to do it, but if anything I've learned that I tend to overcomplicate things.

Anyway, I figured out the problem was my rotated frame. I plugged the ##2 t_{\text{max}}## I got above into the unrotated horizontal component of the distance equation and got the same equation haruspex did. Though I still don't know why rotating my frame an arbitrary angle offset my answer by exactly 90º.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top