MHB Throwing a Ball Up: Motion & Time to Max Height

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dustinsfl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ball
AI Thread Summary
An object thrown vertically upward with an initial speed $v_0$ experiences motion described by the equations of velocity and position, factoring in gravitational and drag forces. The velocity over time is given by $v_y(t) = v_0e^{-t/\tau} - v_{\text{ter}}(1 - e^{-t/\tau})$, where $v_{\text{ter}}$ is the terminal velocity. The position function is derived from integrating the velocity, resulting in $y(t) = -tv_{\text{ter}} + \tau(v_{\text{ter}} + v_0)(1 - e^{-t/\tau})$. The maximum height is reached at time $t = \tau\ln\left(1 + \frac{v_0}{v_{\text{ter}}}\right)$. This analysis effectively combines the effects of initial velocity and drag in vertical motion.
Dustinsfl
Messages
2,217
Reaction score
5
Consider an object that is thrown vertically up with initial speed $v_0$ in a linear medium.
Measuring $y$ upward from the point of release, write expressions for the object's velocity $v_y(t)$ and position $y(t)$.
The equation of motion is
\begin{alignat*}{3}
m\dot{v}_y & = & -mg - bv_y\\
& = & -b\left(\frac{mg}{b} + v_y\right)\\
\dot{v}_y & = & -\frac{b}{m}\left(v_{\text{ter}} + v_y\right)\\
& = & -\frac{1}{\tau}\left(v_{\text{ter}} + v_y\right)\\
\int_{v_0}^{v_y}\frac{dv_y'}{v_{\text{ter}} + v_y'} & = & -\frac{1}{\tau}\int_0^t dt'\\
\ln\left(\frac{v_{\text{ter}} + v_y}{v_{\text{ter}} + v_0}\right) & = & -\frac{t}{\tau}\\
v_y(t) & = & (v_{\text{ter}} + v_0)e^{-t/\tau} - v_{\text{ter}}\\
& = & v_0e^{-t/\tau} - v_{\text{ter}}(1 - e^{-t/\tau})
\end{alignat*}
Next, we need to solve for $y(t)$ where $\dot{y}(t) = v_y(t)$.
\begin{alignat*}{3}
\dot{y}(t) & = & v_0e^{-t/\tau} - v_{\text{ter}}(1 - e^{-t/\tau})\\
\int_{y_0 = 0}^ydy' & = & \int_0^t(v_{\text{ter}} + v_0)e^{-t'/\tau}dt' - \int_0^tv_{\text{ter}} dt'\\
y(t) & = & -tv_{\text{ter}} + \tau(v_{\text{ter}} + v_0)(1 - e^{-t/\tau})\\
\end{alignat*}
The time it reaches $y_{\max}$ is $t = \tau\ln\left(1 + \frac{v_0}{v_{\text{ter}}}\right)$ correct?
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Correct.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top