Throwing a Rock Up a Hill: Finding Final Vertical Displacement

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bryson
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hill Rock
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a physics problem involving a stone thrown up a hill at a specific angle. The initial approach focused on finding time and vertical displacement, but the tutor encountered difficulties due to multiple unknowns. Suggestions included eliminating time from the equations and using the trajectory of the rock in relation to the hill's slope. A key recommendation was to express horizontal distance in terms of vertical displacement, leading to a more manageable equation. The conversation highlights the importance of simplifying the problem to find a solution effectively.
Bryson
Messages
56
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



I was tutoring the other day, when we came across a problem that had me stumped!

A person standing on a hill that forms an angle \theta = 30^o wrt to the horizon, throws a stone at {\bf v} = 16 m/s up the hill at an angle \phi = 65^o wrt to the horizon. Find y_f.

Homework Equations



y_f = v_{y_i}t + \frac{1}{2}a_yt^2

v_{x_i} = \frac{x_f}{t}

The Attempt at a Solution



My thought process is the first find time (t), then solve for y_f.

Initially I thought to take the ratio of v_x and v_y, which would result in an equation involving tan(\phi - \theta), but it involves too many unknowns (t, x_f).

I know I need to utilize the angles in someway, and that finding h_{max}, R will not help in this situation. Any suggestions on how to start this problem would be greatly appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hint: Find an expression for y as a function of x.
 
I tried this but here is what I got: y_f = x_f tan(\phi - \theta) + \frac{1}{2}a_y t^2. Still too many unknowns though, assuming my algebra and logic is correct of course.
 
Bryson said:
I tried this but here is what I got: y_f = x_f tan(\phi - \theta) + \frac{1}{2}a_y t^2. Still too many unknowns though, assuming my algebra and logic is correct of course.
Get rid of time in that equation. Not sure why you are subtracting angles at this point.

Find the trajectory of the rock, then compare that to an equation describing the hill.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Getting rid of t is usually straight forward. You know the horizontal velocity and can write an equation for the horizontal distance Xf in terms of Yf from the slope.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Getting rid of time; the only way I see that is if I substitute t = \frac{x_f}{v_x}, giving us

y_f = x_f tan(\theta) + \frac{1}{2 v_x^2} a_y x_f^2.

Perhaps I do not understand, we do not know y_f, nor x_f.
 
Yep, got it. I was on the wrong track. . . I would shoot myself in the foot, but instead I may get rid of it altogether!

Thanks for the help and quick replies.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
10K
Back
Top