Thrust imparted from a photon?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jonatron5
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Photon Thrust
jonatron5
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
If I produced a material that neither absorbed nor reflected light. Or at least did so to an extremely miniscule amount and set it in space and hit it with light. Would there be any thrust imparted unto it?

If so would it be significant?
My initial thoughts would be that sense it is massless there would be no thrust. But if the particle cannot pass through the object reflect off the object or go around the object , it has to move the object. No?

Also if light is massless and cannot be slowed let us say I take a perfect mirror and craft a box out of it and make it small enough that the inside can contain a single photon, what would happen?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jonatron5 said:
If I produced a material that neither absorbed nor reflected light.
I guess scattering is forbidden as well?
Then it would not interact with light at all, the material is completely transparent. No thrust.
To get thrust, it has to absorb, reflect or scatter light.

Light is massless, but it has momentum.
jonatron5 said:
Also if light is massless and cannot be slowed
It can be slower in a medium that interacts with light.
jonatron5 said:
Also if light is massless and cannot be slowed let us say I take a perfect mirror and craft a box out of it and make it small enough that the inside can contain a single photon, what would happen?
The photon would stay inside. In the radio-frequency range, there are good approximations to perfect mirrors - they can store electromagnetic oscillations for several seconds.
 
If the material "neither absorbed nor reflected light", where does the light go?
 
HallsofIvy said:
If the material "neither absorbed nor reflected light", where does the light go?

it just passes through, without an effect...
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top