TI-84 Plus Weird Graphing Problem

AI Thread Summary
A user is experiencing an issue with their TI-84 calculator, where an unwanted stretched parabola appears whenever they graph functions, obstructing their view of the intended graphs. They seek solutions to resolve this problem. A suggestion is made to reset the calculator's memory as a potential fix. Further troubleshooting steps or insights from other users may be necessary to fully address the issue. The discussion highlights common graphing problems encountered with the TI-84.
draxus
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello all,
I have been having a really strange problem lately on my TI-84. Whenever I graph anything, there is always another graph which appears as a stretched parabola that spans the first and fourth quadrant. It is annoying because I cannot view certain parts of the graph I want to. Anyone know how to fix this?

Thanks in advance
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Have you tried resetting your memory on the calculator?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top