Tidal Forces/Fields: Analyzing N-Body Simulation Data

  • Thread starter Thread starter Allday
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Tidal
Allday
Messages
164
Reaction score
1
Hey people,

Im doing some analysis of some N-body simulation data. I'm trying to calculate the tidal forces exerted on the smaller groups of particles by the other mass. I have a model for the distribution of matter causing the tidal field so I can analytically calculate the gravitational potential and the directional second derivatives, but how do I translate that into the forces. Anybody have a reference for some good reading on the subject.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Allday said:
Hey people,

Im doing some analysis of some N-body simulation data. I'm trying to calculate the tidal forces exerted on the smaller groups of particles by the other mass. I have a model for the distribution of matter causing the tidal field so I can analytically calculate the gravitational potential and the directional second derivatives, but how do I translate that into the forces. Anybody have a reference for some good reading on the subject.

Well if you have a potential V(x,y,z) then the force in cartesian coordinates (x,y,z) is given by
<br /> F_x = \frac{\partial{V}}{\partial{x}} \hspace{.25 in} F_y = \frac{\partial{V}}{\partial{y}} \hspace{.25 in} F_z = \frac{\partial{V}}{\partial{z}}<br />

and if you have a unit vector U, the tidal force T is another vector, the gradient of the force F in the direction of vector U, given by

<br /> T_x = \frac{\partial^2{V}}{\partial x \partial x}} U_x + <br /> \frac{\partial^2{V}}{\partial x \partial y}} U_y + <br /> \frac{\partial^2{V}}{\partial x \partial z}} U_z <br />
<br /> T_y = \frac{\partial^2{V}}{\partial y\partial x}} U_x + <br /> \frac{\partial^2{V}}{\partial y\partial y}} U_y + <br /> \frac{\partial^2{V}}{\partial y\partial z}} U_z <br />
<br /> T_z = \frac{\partial^2{V}}{\partial z\partial x}} U_x + <br /> \frac{\partial^2{V}}{\partial z\partial y}} U_y + <br /> \frac{\partial^2{V}}{\partial z\partial z}} U_z <br />

You can write this in tensor notation

<br /> T^i = K^i{}_j U^j<br />

where K^i{}_j = \frac{\partial^2{V}}{\partial x^i \partial x^j}


It gets more complicated if you want to use general (non-cartesian) coordinates

But you can always say that the tidal forces at a point are given by a second rank tensor, one that takes in a vector (the displacement) and spits out a vector (the tidal force).

I *think* that the partial derivates should normally alll commute, so <br /> \frac{\partial^2 V}{\partial x \partial y} = \frac{\partial^2 V}{\partial y \partial x}

Google finds "Clairaut's theorem"

http://planetmath.org/encyclopedia/ClairautsTheorem.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:


Hi there, it sounds like you are on the right track with your analysis of the N-body simulation data. To calculate the tidal forces, you will need to use the gravitational potential and the directional second derivatives. These can be calculated using mathematical equations, as you mentioned.

To translate this into forces, you will need to use the equation F = -m∇Φ, where F is the force, m is the mass of the smaller group of particles, and ∇Φ is the gradient of the gravitational potential. This will give you the magnitude and direction of the tidal force exerted on the particles.

As for references, I would recommend looking into textbooks or articles on celestial mechanics or astrophysics. You can also find some helpful resources online, such as lectures or tutorials on tidal forces and N-body simulations. Good luck with your analysis!
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
Back
Top