Time average of SHO kinetic energy = (1/2)E

teroenza
Messages
190
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement


I believe I understand the problem except I cannot get

the time average of [sin(wt-d)]^2 = ½

I can do the rest once this is established.

Homework Equations



Average of a function= <function>= 1/(period)* integral(f*dt) from 0 to the period

Function to be averaged = [sin(wt-d)]^2

Period of sin(t)^2 is pi, so period of [sin(wt-d)]^2 is wt-d=pi --> t=(pi+d)/w

w=omega
d = delta
(This is for a problem on the average kinetic energy of a simple harmonic oscillator.) Taylor "Classical Mechanics" 5.12

The Attempt at a Solution




Used Identity sin(t)^2 = (1/2)(1-cos(2*t))

<[sin(wt-d)]^2 > = w/(pi+d)(1/2) [ (pi+d)/w - integral cos(2wt-2d)dt from 0 to (pi+d)/w]

Where I have already integrated for the first term in [ ]. My issue is that I need the last term in [ ] to be zero. Then I wold get the desired (1/2) result. To solve the integral

I do a u substitution ,
u = 2wt+2d
dt= 1/(w*2)du
Upper bound (pi+d)/w becomes 2*pi
Lower bound (0) becomes -2d

The lower bound is what prevents me from eliminating the term. When integrated I get
1/(w*2) [ sin(2*pi) - sin(-2d)]

I have tried and checked many times. Did I set up the problem wrong? It seems to be so close.

Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your error is here: << ... from 0 to (pi+d)/w] >>

The difference between the lower and the upper bound on your integration must be an integer number of periods One period would do nicely, which is T = 2π/ω.
 
Thank you. I now realize my error.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top