I Time derivative using the quotient rule

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on verifying the application of the quotient rule for taking the time derivative of a function involving time-dependent variables "r" and "theta." The original poster is seeking confirmation on their mathematical approach while working on a numerical mechanics problem. Responses indicate that the use of the quotient rule appears to be correct. The poster is encouraged to double-check their calculations to resolve discrepancies in their results. Overall, the thread emphasizes the importance of careful mathematical verification in problem-solving.
Mishal0488
Messages
20
Reaction score
1
Hi Guys

Sorry for the rudimentary post. I am busy with a numerical solution to a mechanics problem, and the results are just not as expected. I am re-checking the mathematics to ensure that all is in order in doing so I am second guessing a few things

Referring to the attached scan, is the quotient rule used correctly when taking the time derivative of the function? Note that both "r" and "theta" are time dependent.

Thanks in advance
 

Attachments

  • Capture.JPG
    Capture.JPG
    10.4 KB · Views: 129
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks right.
 

Thread '1:1 versus 2:1 Mechanical Advantage debate'

The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
View full post »

Thread 'Free fall of person in a sled to direct horizontal motion by atmospheric resistance'

Let there be a person in a not yet optimally designed sled at h meters in height. Let this sled free fall but user can steer by tilting their body weight in the sled or by optimal sled shape design point it in some horizontal direction where it is wanted to go - in any horizontal direction but once picked fixed. How to calculate horizontal distance d achievable as function of height h. Thus what is f(h) = d. Put another way, imagine a helicopter rises to a height h, but then shuts off all...
View full post »

Thread 'Newton's first law?'

Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
View full post »

Similar threads

I Time Derivatives: Hi Guys, Am I on the Right Track?
Replies
3
Views
805
I Question about the quotient rule of derivatives
Replies
12
Views
5K
I Why is the derivative defined as the limit of the quotient?
Replies
13
Views
2K
I Meaning of "passage to the quotient"?
Replies
3
Views
427
I Treating the Derivative like a Quotient
Replies
15
Views
2K
I Adding total time derivative to Lagrangian/Canonical Transformations
Replies
2
Views
177
I Using reference frames for derivation of Lagrangian
Replies
25
Views
2K
Limit question to be done without using derivatives
Replies
25
Views
1K
What is the (higher order) time derivative of centripetal acceleration?
Replies
2
Views
1K
Is there place for higher order derivatives in mechanics?
Replies
5
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top