Will Two Synchronized Atomic Clocks Remain in Sync After One Year?

AI Thread Summary
Two synchronized atomic clocks will not remain in sync after one year due to time dilation effects caused by the clock on the satellite moving at high speeds relative to the stationary clock on Earth. The moving clock experiences less passage of time compared to the stationary clock, resulting in a time difference. If the speed of light were only twice the average speed of the satellite, the time dilation would be more pronounced, leading to an even greater discrepancy between the two clocks. The calculations demonstrate that as the speed of the satellite approaches the speed of light, the effects of time dilation become significant. Therefore, both theoretical reasoning and calculations support the conclusion that the two clocks will not remain synchronized.
Lauren12
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two atomic clocks are synchronized. One is placed on a satellite which orbits around the Earth at high speeds for a whole year. The other is placed in a lab and remains at rest with respect to the earth. You may assume both clocks can measure time accurately to many significant digits.

a)Will the two clocks still be synchronized after one year?
b) imagine the speed of light is much lower than its actual value. How would the results of this experiment change if the speed of light was only twice the average speed of the satellite? Explain your reasoning using a calculation.

Homework Equations



Δtm = Δts/√(1-v^2/c^2)

The Attempt at a Solution



No, the two clocks will not be synchronized after one year. The clock on the satellite will lose very small amount of time due to their motion with respect to the clocks on earth. The clock in outer space has changed frame of reference while the clock on Earth has not.

b)
If the speed of light was only twice the average speed of the satellite more time dilation would occur. As objects approach the speed of light, time becomes dilated.
Let x= the speed of the satellite
therefore 2x= the speed of light
Is it a valid move to call it x? They do not give us a velocity for the satellite...
t_s= 3.1536 * 10^7 (seconds in a year)

Δtm = Δts/√(1-v^2/c^2)
Δtm = Δts/√(1-(x^2)/(4x^2))
Δtm =(3.1536 * 10^7) /√(1-0.25)
Δtm =36414636.18

Since they said "explain your reason with calculations" do you think it's necessary to do a calculation for a) ?
Thanks for any input! :D
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If the question was given in the same way as above then I suspect that you only would have to justify your answer with a calculation in b). But my experience says that a calculation as extra justification will never harm.

Therefore you might add a mathematical argument to support your answer in question a) if you feel unsure.
 
Last edited:
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top