Time Dilation & Contraction: Conflicting Clocks

  • Thread starter Thread starter intervoxel
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Clocks
intervoxel
Messages
192
Reaction score
1
The ship leaves the station carrying two mirror clocks. One aligned with the motion. The other, orthogonal to the first. One suffers length contraction but the other does not. I suppose time dilation acts on both. So we have a contradiction here. What is happenning in fact?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
(a)What do you think the observer on the ship sees regarding her local clocks?

(b) Now try to write down [explain] excatly what you think is a 'contradication' and post it here.

(c) Hint: What is the 'contradiction here: Observers in relative motion each see the other's clock as ticking slower than their own.
 
I forgot to say that the observer remains at the station.
 
The one aligned orthogonal suffers no length contraction. But, from the station observer, light is following a zigzag path between the mirrors. Thus, the station observer sees the train clock 'tick' slower because of the longer light path. The longer light path is sqrt(L^2 + (vt)^2), L being distance between mirrors. This must equal distance light travels, so we have ct = sqrt(L^2 + (vt)^2) . Solving for t, we get tick of train clock as seen from station: (L/c)/sqrt(1-(v/c)^2).

Now, for horizontal clock, we have contracted length L' = L sqrt(1-(v/c)^2). Here the train clicks are asymmetric, seen from the station; the station observer sees the train observer treat the sum of the asymmetric clicks as two even clicks. For the station observer, for the click with light moving the same direction as the train, t0 = L'/(c-v); for the other click, t1 = L'/(c+v). If you work this out, you see that t0+t1 = 2(L/c)/sqrt(1-(v/c)^2), consistent with the clock rate for the orthogonal clock.
 
The one aligned with the direction of motion (light goes forward and backward between the mirrors) will appear to the station observer that the light going forward will take longer to travel the distance, shorter time to travel the backwards distance. This distance is the same for both directions and contracted.

The other one will have equal travel times, both clocks will "tick" the same rate (meaning a round trip light bounce will be the same time for both), and both tick slower than the observer's clock at the station.

An observer on the ship will see both ship clocks act and tick identically, and will see the station observer's clock to be slow, and the station contracted.
 
Last edited:
Thank you all. Things are clear now.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...

Similar threads

Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
45
Views
5K
Replies
54
Views
3K
Replies
88
Views
7K
Replies
18
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Back
Top