Time Dilation Observed in Relative Frames: A Simple Question

rajeshmarndi
Messages
319
Reaction score
0
There are only two frame moving relative with each other at certain velocity. One frame see the other going right and the other to the left.

Isn't it contradict that each see the other time running slow and both are correct?

And this isn't the case , where one twin leave Earth and each see each other leaving. In this one experience acceleration and rest other details explanation is existed.

Its a simple question, but I'm unable to answer.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
rajeshmarndi said:
There are only two frame moving relative with each other at certain velocity. One frame see the other going right and the other to the left.

Isn't it contradict that each see the other time running slow and both are correct?
There is no contradiction, as long as you also allow for the relativity of simultaneity. There are a number of other threads in this forum explaining how this works. For example www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=729941 and https://www.physicsforums.com/showpost.php?p=4556116&postcount=16

And this isn't the case , where one twin leave Earth and each see each other leaving. In this one experience acceleration and rest other details explanation is existed.
In this case the situation is not symmetrical because one twin experiences acceleration and the other doesn't. Because the situation is not symmetrical, there's no reason to expect them both to believe that the other's clock is running slow, and indeed they will both agree that the accelerated twin is the slow one. You should carefully study the FAQ at http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SR/TwinParadox/twin_paradox.html, come back if after reading that you still have quations.
 
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
Abstract The gravitational-wave signal GW250114 was observed by the two LIGO detectors with a network matched-filter signal-to-noise ratio of 80. The signal was emitted by the coalescence of two black holes with near-equal masses ## m_1=33.6_{-0.8}^{+1.2} M_{⊙} ## and ## m_2=32.2_{-1. 3}^{+0.8} M_{⊙}##, and small spins ##\chi_{1,2}\leq 0.26 ## (90% credibility) and negligible eccentricity ##e⁢\leq 0.03.## Postmerger data excluding the peak region are consistent with the dominant quadrupolar...

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
88
Views
7K
Replies
54
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
1K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
3K
Back
Top