Time Dilation/Twin paradox Question

  • Thread starter Thread starter wilson_chem90
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Paradox Time
AI Thread Summary
In a discussion about the time dilation and twin paradox, a scenario is presented where a 30-year-old astronaut travels to a star 40 light-years away at 0.90c. Initial calculations suggested she would age about 21 years during the trip, while her son would age 48 years. However, it was pointed out that the round trip takes 80 years for light, meaning the astronaut's calculations were incorrect. The corrected calculations show that the astronaut would actually age approximately 38 years, returning at age 68, while her son would age 88 years. The discussion highlights the complexities of relativistic effects in time dilation scenarios.
wilson_chem90
Messages
137
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 30 year old femal astronaut leaves her newborn child on Earth and goes on a round-trip voyage at a star that is 40 light-years away in a spaceship traveling at 0.90 c. What will be the ages of the astronaut and her son when she returns?


Homework Equations


t = to / {1 - v^2/c^2} ( { } = Square Root)


The Attempt at a Solution



Since its 40 light years away traveling at .90 c. That means it'll take 48 years for the whole trip. ( 0.20 x 40 light years + 40 = 48 years)

to = t {1 - v^2/c^2}
= 48 years { 1 - (0.90c)^2/c^2}
= 48 years(0.43589)
= 20.923 years

Therefore, the mother will have aged approx. 21 years, making her 51 years old when she returns and her son will have aged 48 years, making him 48 years old when his mother returns.


I'm not entirely sure if this is correct. Hopefully it is...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your reasoning is incorrect. If the star is 40 l.y. away, this means that it takes light 80 years to make the round trip. Surely it can't take the astronaut less than that, baby or no baby. Begin by calculating (correctly) how many years baby thinks mama is gone. Find gamma and then find mama's age.
 
OHHHH the calculation is 80 l-y + (0.2)(40 l-y) = so its 88 years. I hope...

to = t {1 - v^2/c^2}
= 88 years { 1 - (0.90c)^2/c^2}
= 88 years(0.43589)
= 38.36 years

Therefore, the mother will have aged approx. 38 years, making her 68 years old when she returns and her son will have aged 88 years, making him 88 years old when his mother returns.

thats one old baby!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top