Time evolution of spherical harmonics

misterme09
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


At t=0, a given wavefunction is:

\left\langle\theta,\phi|\psi(0)\right\rangle = \frac{\imath}{\sqrt{2}}(Y_{1,1}+Y_{1,-1})

Find \left\langle\theta,\phi|\psi(t)\right\rangle.

Homework Equations


\hat{U}(t)\left|\psi(0)\right\rangle = e^{-\imath\hat{H}t/\hbar}\left|\psi(t)\right\rangle

<br /> \hat{H}\left|\ E,l,m\right\rangle = E\left|\ E,l,m\right\rangle<br />
<br /> \hat{L^{2}}\left|\ E,l,m\right\rangle = l(l+1)\hbar^{2}\left|\ E,l,m\right\rangle<br />
<br /> \hat{L_{z}}\left|\ E,l,m\right\rangle = m\hbar\left|\ E,l,m\right\rangle<br />

The Attempt at a Solution


I know that you can use the above operator to make time evolution of an energy eigenstate, but I can't figure out what energy to use for the two spherical harmonics in the given state at t=0.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It depends on what the hamiltonian is.
 
Oh, okay, I should have realized this.

This is for a rigid rotator with Hamiltonian

\hat{H}=\hat{L^{2}}/2I

So this means that the energies are both:

E =1(1+1)\hbar^{2}/2I = \hbar^{2}/I

And

\left\langle\theta,\phi|\psi(t)\right\rangle=\frac{i}{\sqrt{2}}e^{-\imath\hbar t/I}(Y_{1,1}+Y_{1,-1})
 
Last edited:
Yep.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top