Time Evolution of the Gaussian packet

ehrenfest
Messages
2,001
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Can someone give me a general idea (I do not need and probably will not understand the rigorous mathematics) of how you can use the propagator equation

\psi(x,t) = \int{U(x,t;x',t')\psi(x',t')dx'},

the equation for a Gaussian wave packet,

\psi(x',0)= e^{i p_0 x'/\hbar}\frac{e^-x'^2/2\Delta^2}{(\pi\Delta^2)^{1/4}},

to arrive at the equation \psi(x,t) = [\pi^{1/2}(\Delta+\frac{i +\hbar t}{m\Delta})]^{-1/2} <br /> <br /> exp{\frac{-(x-p_0 t/m)^2}{2\Delta^2(1+i \hbar t/m \Delta^2}} <br /> <br /> X exp[\frac{i p_0}{\hbar}(x - \frac{p_0 t}{2m}) ]

Is this just a really complicated integration method? Is that a cross product or multiplcation? If it is a cross product how does come in? See Shankar 154 for more context.




Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I really do not know of any integration methods that give a cross product so I don't know. Just a general explanation would be helpfull.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
If the propagator "U" is the free propagator then you can actually just write it down explicity and then you just have to do a gaussian integral to get the result. If "U" is the propagator for almost any other system the problem gets hella harder.The "X" is not a "cross product." how could it be a cross product!?... there are no vectors!
 
You're right about the cross-product. Then I have no idea why the author used an X instead of a dot for multiplication. It is actually a free propagator. So that is just the result of the Gaussian integral with the propagator and the initial psi...I see.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top