Explaining Time Homogeneous Lagrangian and Hamiltonian Conservation

AI Thread Summary
If the Lagrangian is time-homogeneous, the Hamiltonian is indeed a conserved quantity, as indicated by the condition ∂L/∂t = 0. This means that in systems where the Lagrangian does not explicitly depend on time, the Hamiltonian represents a constant of motion. A common example is the simple harmonic oscillator, where the Hamiltonian corresponds to the total energy of the system, combining kinetic and potential energy. The discussion also touches on deriving Hamilton's equations to further validate this relationship. Understanding these principles is crucial for analyzing dynamic systems in classical mechanics.
eman2009
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
if the lagrangian is time homogenous ,the hamiltonian is a constant of the motion .
Is this statement correct ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
if \frac{\partial L}{\partial t}=0 then the hamiltonian is a conserved quantity. So yes. If the lagrangian doesn't explicitly depend on time, H is conserved.
 
can you give me example ?
 
well, the typical situation (where your coordinates are somewhat normal (ie, can be related somehow to the cartesian coordinate system in a time independent fashion) then the hamiltonian is the energy of the system.

ie, simple harmonic oscillator:

L=T-U= 1/2 m x'^2 - 1/2 k x^2

where m is the mass, k is the spring constant, the first term is the kinetic energy (1/2 m v^2) and the second term is the potential (1/2 k x^2)

in this case H=T+U = Kinetic Energy + Potential Energy = Total Energy = Constant
 
Mandatory exercise: Derive Hamilton's equations and prove the result.
 
how we can explain the differential of lagrangian is a perfect ?L dt
 
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Dear all, in an encounter of an infamous claim by Gerlich and Tscheuschner that the Greenhouse effect is inconsistent with the 2nd law of thermodynamics I came to a simple thought experiment which I wanted to share with you to check my understanding and brush up my knowledge. The thought experiment I tried to calculate through is as follows. I have a sphere (1) with radius ##r##, acting like a black body at a temperature of exactly ##T_1 = 500 K##. With Stefan-Boltzmann you can calculate...
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (First part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8 and stuck at some statements. It's little bit confused. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. Solution : The surface bound charge on the ##xy## plane is of opposite sign to ##q##, so the force will be...
Back
Top