Time-Independent Perturbation Theory

eep
Messages
225
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I'm working out the 2nd Edition of Quantum Mechanics by Bransden & Joachain and I'm a little puzzled by the sign of the last term in equation 8.30 on page 380, which reads...

<br /> a_{nl}^{(2)} = \frac{1}{E_n^{(0)} - E_l^{(0)}}\sum_{k{\neq}n} \frac{H_{lk}^{&#039;}H_{kn}^{&#039;}}{E_n^{(0)} - E_l^{(0)}} - \frac{H_{nn}^{&#039;}H_{ln}^{&#039;}}{(E_n^{(0)} - E_l^{(0)})^2} - a_{nn}^{(1)}\frac{H_{ln}^{&#039;}}{E_n^{(0)} - E_l^{(0)}}<br />

They are deriving the formula for the coeffecients of the 2nd order correction of the wave function expanded into the basis of the unperturbed wavefunctions. That is,

<br /> \psi_n^{(2)} = \sum_k a_{nk}\psi_k^{(0)}<br />

We have derived that...

<br /> a_{nl}^{(2)}(E_l^{(0)} - E_n^{(0)}) + \sum_kH_{lk}^{&#039;}a_{nk}^{(1)} - E_n^{(1)}a_{nl}^{(1)} = 0<br />

for l not equal to n.

Ignoring the other parts of the equation, we move the sum over to the other side by subtracting it, and we know from before that...

<br /> a_{nk}^{(1)} = \frac{H_{kl}^&#039;}{E_n^{(0)} - E_k^{(0)}}<br />

for k not equal to n. So for k equal to n we have the leftover term

<br /> a_{nn}^{(1)}H_{ln}^&#039;<br />

which has a minus sign in front of it when moved to the other side, so we have

<br /> a_{nl}^{(2)}(E_l^{(0)} - E_n^{(0)}) = -a_{nn}^{(1)}H_{ln}^{&#039;} - \sum...<br />

where I have ommited the rest of the sum and the other terms. Now, obviously, we can divide by (E_l^{(0)} - E_n^{(0)}), pull out a negative sign, and switch the order of the subtraction. This makes the overall term positive, does it not? The rest of the summation is not negative so I don't understand why this term would be...
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, some other people seem to think it's a plus as well, including the professor. So that's that solved.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top