Time it takes for block to slide down an incline in elevator

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the time it takes for a block to slide down an incline within an accelerating elevator. Key concepts include the use of Newton's second law (f=ma), kinematics, and relative acceleration. The participants clarify the notation used for accelerations, specifically Amg (acceleration of mass relative to ground), Ame (acceleration of mass relative to elevator), and Aeg (acceleration of elevator relative to ground). The equations derived include -mgsinΘ = mamgx for the x-direction and -mgcosΘ + Fn = mamgy for the y-direction, emphasizing the need to consider the non-inertial frame of the elevator.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's second law (f=ma)
  • Familiarity with kinematics in physics
  • Knowledge of relative acceleration concepts
  • Basic understanding of inclined planes and forces acting on them
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the effects of non-inertial frames in mechanics
  • Learn about the dynamics of objects on inclined planes
  • Explore advanced kinematics equations for varying acceleration
  • Investigate the role of pseudo forces in non-inertial reference frames
USEFUL FOR

Students studying mechanics, physics educators, and anyone interested in understanding the dynamics of objects in non-inertial frames, particularly in relation to inclined planes and relative motion.

FruitNinja
Messages
20
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



MECHANICS:

Given Theta, L, M, and acceleration of elevator relative to ground. Find the time it takes for the block to reach the end of the incline.

Here is a diagram: http://k-elahian.com/tmp/nip.PNG

Homework Equations


f=ma
kinematics
relative acceleration

The Attempt at a Solution


I've gotten 3 different answers so far. Basically I do f=ma for the m mass and then split it into x and y (slanted system) and then I relate the accelerations of the the bodes Amg=Ame+Aeg (ground is g and elevator is e).
After finding Ame I use that in my kinematics equation.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your notation is a bit odd, what does Amg=Ame+Aeg mean exactly? What is the A? Can you explain what exactly you mean?
 
I'm not sure if I understand what you've tried to do
But start by calculating the pseudo force on the block due to the elevators Motion and also the other forces on it. I think you can proceed from there.
You say you've got 3 answers
Unless you state what were your answers, how should we judge if it's right or wrong?
 
What does Aeg mean? Is that relative acceleration?
 
Yes,
Amg is acceleration of m relative to g
Aeg is acceleration of elevator relative to ground.
Since I cannot use fictitious forces I need to use relative accelerations.

Amg=Ame+Aeg just shows that the a of the mass relative to the ground is the sum of the 2 relative accelerations vectors
 
FruitNinja said:
Yes,
Amg is acceleration of m relative to g
Aeg is acceleration of elevator relative to ground.
Since I cannot use fictitious forces I need to use relative accelerations.

Amg=Ame+Aeg just shows that the a of the mass relative to the ground is the sum of the 2 relative accelerations vectors

Okay, so what equation did you find pre-substitution?
 
Student100 said:
Okay, so what equation did you find pre-substitution?
-mgsinΘ = mamgx for the x and -mgcosΘ+Fn=mamgy for the y
are the x and y components of f=ma for the block, but I am using a slanted coordinate frame
 
FruitNinja said:
-mgsinΘ = mamgx for the x and -mgcosΘ+Fn=mamgy for the y
are the x and y components of f=ma for the block, but I am using a slanted coordinate frame

Okay, so I don't understand what you're trying to write.

Maybe it will help if we just look at an incline plane first without the added acceleration, If we rotate the coordinate axis ##\theta##, what's the acceleration down the plane in this case?
 
Student100 said:
Okay, so I don't understand what you're trying to write.

Maybe it will help if we just look at an incline plane first without the added acceleration, If we rotate the coordinate axis ##\theta##, what's the acceleration down the plane in this case?

yeah I did that in the equation above. for the y, -mgcosΘ+Fn are the 2 forces acting on the block. (slanted frame). amgy just means the acceleration of the mass relative to the ground in the y direction
 
  • #10
FruitNinja said:
yeah I did that in the equation above. for the y, -mgcosΘ+Fn are the 2 forces acting on the block. (slanted frame). amgy just means the acceleration of the mass relative to the ground in the y direction

Why is there an acceleration in the y direction in the rotated coordinate system?

Hang with me for a second I'll get you to the answer, ignore the elevator for a second, what's the sum of the forces in the x and y looking only at an inclined plane?
 
  • #11
Student100 said:
Why is there an acceleration in the y direction in the rotated coordinate system?

Hang with me for a second I'll get you to the answer, ignore the elevator for a second, what's the sum of the forces in the x and y looking only at an inclined plane?

Ok, It's just Fg and Fn. Those are the only 2 forces acting on the block.

for X: -mgsinΘ , no fn here and for Y: -mgcosΘ+Fn
 
  • #12
FruitNinja said:
Ok, It's just Fg and Fn. Those are the only 2 forces acting on the block.

for X: -mgsinΘ , no fn here and for Y: -mgcosΘ+Fn

So ##mgsin(\theta)=ma## and ##N - mgcos(\theta) = 0##, correct?

You know why the y direction is in equilibrium when we rotate the system, correct?
 
  • #13
Student100 said:
So ##mgsin(\theta)=ma## and ##N - mgcos(\theta) = 0##, correct?

You know why the y direction is in equilibrium when we rotate the system, correct?

Yes, if we were not in a elevator yes. But that would be a non-inertial frame so we can't do that, according to my teacher
 
  • #14
FruitNinja said:
Yes, if we were not in a elevator yes. But that would be a non-inertial frame so we can't do that, according to my teacher

Yes, so if you now look back at the accelerating system relative to the plane, this time don't rotate your coordinate system and solve for ##a_{rel}## relative down the plane.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
2K